1 Introduction

1.1 How to use this Bench Book

1.1.1 Purpose and Intention of the Bench Book

The National Bench Book on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and the Legal System seeks to be an interactive and evolving resource used by judicial officers and legal practitioners to guide and assist with decision-making, evidence, procedure, process, professionalism and legal practice, in relation to legal issues before the Federal Court. The purpose of this Bench Book is to provide a practice-oriented and accessible resource for judicial officers, legal practitioners and the broader community which provides context, research, case law and key evidence developed through an Indigenous-led commentary.

This Bench Book has been developed through multiple consultations with key stakeholders including Indigenous legal professionals and community. The intention of this Bench Book is to elevate and bring to the forefront critical evidence, issues, concerns and priorities relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples engaging with the Australian federal and state-based legal systems and laws.

1.1.2 Why this Bench Book

This Bench Book is critical in identifying, contextualising and investigating some of the complex circumstances and conditions which shape First Nations peoples’ engagement with the legal system. It seeks to do this through developing a strong Indigenous standpoint that can assist legal practitioners.

This Bench Book is long overdue. However, it is not without its limitations. Ultimately, this Bench Book will not and cannot provide an authoritative voice. This constraint recognises the authority, rights and responsibilities belonging to Indigenous peoples and communities who are the experts in their own lived experiences. However, this work is created, designed and written from an Indigenous standpoint1 which privileges Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing, informed by a specialist and leading team who have extensive and comprehensive knowledge and skills working alongside Indigenous communities. This Indigenous standpoint is informed by personal and community lived experiences and draws upon leading research, knowledge and practices.

The purpose and aim of this introduction are to introduce and contextualise some of the core issues that currently confront the legal system and constrict legal practice, causing harm for Indigenous community members. Ultimately, a clear theme throughout this Bench Book is the necessity to recognise the authority of individuals and communities; value Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing; identify, respond to and interrogate harmful ideologies, practices and processes that maintain power imbalances; and work within and towards a self-determination framework that recognises and actively supports Indigenous agency.

1.1.3 Navigating this Bench Book

This Bench Book, or any chapter or section of it, can be read in its entirety or dipped into as necessary — for example, when in court or during a break in court proceedings.

Each chapter has been written to stand alone. This means that there may be a reasonable amount of repetition between and within each chapter.

To enable speedy access, there is a detailed contents list at the start of each chapter, and liberal use has been made of lists and case studies. Precise cross-references (including hyperlinks for online versions of sources) have been provided wherever appropriate.

1.1.4 Language and Terms Used across this Bench Book

Across this Bench Book, the terms ‘Indigenous’, ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander’ and ‘First Nations’ are used interchangeably. This Bench Book also refers to Nation groups specifically connected to individuals when available.

Each chapter has been written by a different author/s. This means that there may be slight differences in tone and expression across chapters. Further, First Nations terms and/or the spelling and/or capitalisation of certain words has been maintained to reflect the authors preference and voice.

This approach reflects the diversity of ways in which Indigenous peoples choose to refer to self and community members. This diversity and choice should be respected. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples within legal institutions should have the right to choose the language used to describe themselves and their families and communities.

1.1.5 Our Approach to this Bench Book

The approach undertaken in drafting this Bench Book has sought to privilege Indigenous knowledge and lived experience. The authors of this Bench Book adopt a strengths-based, holistic and trauma-informed approach. In doing so, the authors seek to centre Indigenous voices and approaches, and recognise the ongoing strength, resiliency, authority, diversity and innovation of First Nations communities and peoples. This work seeks to nurture Indigenous wellbeing and develop a deeper understanding of Indigenous standpoints which can shape future relationships.

1.2 Understanding First Nations Perspectives

Identity is all encompassing and includes profound understandings about who we are, which family we belong to, which country we come from, a shared history and future, shared cultural understandings and belongingness… Aboriginal peoples are not all the same; attempts to make us one homogenous group are unacceptable. We have many similarities, but, equally, we are also different.2

— Lyn Henderson-Yates

Across this continent there are diverse First Nations communities and peoples. This diversity is reflected in the existence of over 500 First Nations language dialects prior to colonisation.3 Importantly, there are also diverse historical and contemporary colonial experiences which continue to shape relationships to Country, culture, all beings, Ancestors, community, family and identity.4 These diverse experiences reflect the differing laws and policies which have been used against First Nations peoples and communities and have sought to break down First Nations relationships and pathologise First Nations peoples and communities, causing historical and contemporary personal and collective trauma.5 This diversity also reflects the ongoing resistance, strength and resilience of Indigenous peoples, families and communities to navigate colonial policies.

Recognition of this diversity is critical in eliminating harmful essentialist, romanticised, homogenising, deficit and racialised narratives which seek to define First Nations peoples and communities. These narratives sideline and silence First Nations perspectives, which continues to cause harm and trauma. Acknowledging this diversity is critical for challenging dominant discourses which underpin power imbalances. A deeper understanding and recognition of diversity recognises the importance and value of place-based knowledge, truth-telling, family and community relationships, historical and contemporary lived experiences, contextual knowledge, and the role of Elders as knowledge holders.

1.2.1 Interconnection

Relationality is grounded in a holistic conception of the inter-connectedness and inter-substantiation between and among all living things and the earth, which is inhabited by a world of ancestors and creator beings.6

— Aileen Moreton-Robinson

First Nations ways of knowing, being and doing are inextricably tied with and belong to Country.7 First Nations peoples come from and belong to Country and Country is the source of law and the core of First Nations ontology and cosmology.8 Professor Irene Watson who belongs to the Tanganekald, Meintangk, Bunganditj and Potaruwutj First Nations peoples, states, ‘[o]ur First Nations’ legal systems are embedded in our relationships to the natural world and that which I described as Raw Law: a natural system of obligations and benefits flowing from an Aboriginal ontology’.9 Further, Trawlwulwuy researcher Lauren Tynan writes:

Country inhabits all relationality and is used widely across Australia to describe how all land is Aboriginal land, Aboriginal Country; Country is agentic and encompasses everything from ants, memories, humans, fire, tides and research. Country sits at the heart of coming to know and understand relationality as it is the web that connects humans to a system of Lore/Law and knowledge that can never be human-centric.10

The term ‘Country’ is commonly used by First Nations peoples and communities to refer to Ancestral connections to specific places across this continent, and is used in addition to First Nations place names. However, it transcends this, as observed by Gamilaroi man and respected researcher and educator, Dr Bob Morgan,‘[f]or me, country is fundamentally about community, culture and identity’.11 Morgan observes, ‘Country is more than issues of land and geography; it is about spirituality and identity, knowing who we are and who we are connected to; and it helps us understand how all living things are connected’.12 Further, Dr Mary Graham, a Kombumberri person with connections to Wakka Wakka, writes ‘Place, being, belonging and connectedness all arise out of a locality in Land’.13

This indistinguishable and inextricable connection to Country grounds First Nations roles and responsibilities towards all living and non-living beings through relationality. This is reflected and embodied in First Nations laws and obligations, including notions of custodianship and ‘relational practices’,14 such as practices which are ‘Caring for/as Country’15 — an interconnected worldview placing all things into relationship with all else.16 This interconnected worldview is embedded in First Nations ways of knowing, being and doing and is reflected in the principles of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ social and emotional wellbeing.

1.2.2 Indigenous Storytelling

For Aboriginal peoples, story and storytelling commenced at the beginning. Stories are embodied acts of intertextualised, transgenerational law and life spoken across and through time and place. In and of the everyday and everytime, stories — whether those that told of our origin or of our being now — all carry meaning: a theorised understanding that communicates the world.17

— Louise Gwenneth Phillips and Tracey Bunda

Storytelling is core to First Nations cultures, histories, knowledge systems, and the transmission of knowledge.18 First Nations storytelling embodies law, connection, resilience, resistance, truth-telling, lessons, values, strength, agency and survival.19 As Euahleyai/Gamillaroi woman and Distinguished Professor Larissa Behrendt AO observes:

Storytelling not only challenges or decolonizes institutions, it is a way of reasserting Indigenous voice, perspective, and experience. Storytelling is an act of sovereignty that reinforces Indigenous identity, values, and worldview.20

First Nations storytelling is a complex, rigorous, rich and continuing process of knowledge and knowledge production embedded in First Nations laws21 which predominantly use oral traditions of storytelling which are passed down across generations.

Historically and contemporaneously, colonial policies have sought to break down First Nations knowledge and knowledge production through interrupting the transmission of knowledge via state practices of forced child removal, forced relocation from Country and prohibitions on speaking First Nations languages and practising culture.22 The impacts of these colonial policies on First Nations peoples and communities have caused severe historical and contemporary trauma, publicly evidenced through the powerful and resilient stories shared by members of the Stolen Generations in the Bringing Them Home Report,23 and which continue to be shared through art, song, biographies, and projects such as the Kinchela Boys Home Mobile Education Centre24 and the Coota Girls Survivor Stories Project and Digital Archive.25

Despite the impacts of colonisation, First Nations stories and storytelling continues to survive and thrive and is evidenced within the revitalisation of First Nations languages and cultural practices, and within the sharing of First Nations peoples’ lived experiences. These stories and storytelling exist and are embodied across and within First Nations cultural practices including, but not limited to, ceremony, songs, hunting, dance, cool burning, carving, possum-skin cloak making, painting and weaving. While First Nations storytelling continues to be embedded with orality, it also draws on written processes and techniques for sharing stories. For example, this is evident in First Nations poetry, research methods and methodologies, and fiction and non-fiction writing. Today, First Nations peoples and communities continue to engage in the rich and authoritative practice of storytelling which shares and teaches law, culture, and experiences of ongoing colonisation. This storytelling continues to evidence First Nations relationality, law, learning, sharing, resiliency, strength, agency and healing.

1.3 Glossary of Key Concepts Used across this Bench Book

The National Bench Book on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and the Legal System is guided by several principles derived from First Nations ways of knowing, being and doing. These have been drawn upon in drafting this resource for the purpose of guiding judicial officers and legal professionals to engage on a deeper and more nuanced level with First Nations standpoints in relation to legal disputes, priorities, concerns, needs and issues. These principles are described in this glossary of key concepts and are not exhaustive, exclusive or culturally authoritative over First Nations peoples and communities. Rather, they are drawn from Indigenous standpoints which are expressed through legal cases and arguments, leading research projects, and Indigenous-led and informed commentary.

Importantly, these concepts are interconnected, and this interconnection will be explored in the following chapters through case examples and Indigenous-led commentary. The purpose of this is for readers to be informed of Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing which can be considered by the legal community in practice, procedure and substantive law. However, it is critical to note the limitations which inherently exist, and which require engagement on a personal level through building respectful and reciprocal relationships with Indigenous clients, witnesses, parties, practitioners, community members, families, Country and Nation groups. This relationship building is key to learning through and with First Nations peoples and their knowledge processes and approaches. This reciprocal and respectful learning through listening and being in relationship with community members can lead to more just outcomes which can alleviate and avoid harm.

1.3.1 Collective, Historical and Intergeneration Trauma

In understanding First Nations peoples’ wellbeing and connections today, it is critical to acknowledge and understand the consequences and impacts of historical and ongoing colonial policies implemented against First Nations peoples, communities and Country which have sought to erode, fracture and break down these connections. These policies include, but are not limited to, massacres, frontier wars, dispossession, dislocation, forced child removal, theft of Ancestral remains, assimilation, slavery, white knowledge production, and criminalisation. The Seedling Group co-founders and directors, Nicole Tujague and Kelleigh Ryan, descendants of the Kabi Kabi people, state:

In Australia, colonisation has brought widespread and ongoing collective trauma for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Fundamentally flawed historical and current government policies continue to impact on multiple peoples across multiple generations. Huge numbers of Aboriginal people were removed from their communities, taken from their Nations, out of their language groups where they had their own lore, their own marriage rules, their own songlines, trading routes, rituals and ceremonies. People from different Nations were forced to live together in government and church-controlled places like reserves or missions. They were expected to live as one homogenous race. Removal often meant the loss of cultural practices, reciprocal relationships, kinship lines and connections. Connections acknowledge relationships to each other, the spirit of rivers, mountains, and all entities of Country, totems, neighbouring Nations and trading lines across time. These are what make you part of a community, make you a family, help you function and give you identity and purpose. Expecting community or those relationships to recover by themselves, is unrealistic.26

The impact of historical colonial policies continues to reverberate onto Indigenous peoples and communities today through personal and collective trauma, and intergenerational and transgenerational trauma. As Wiradjuri researcher Dr BJ Newton observes: ‘Intergenerational trauma occurs when trauma is transferred between a parent and child and subsequent generations’.27

In her groundbreaking work, Emeritus Professor Judy Atkinson, Jiman/Bundjalung woman states, [t]he transmission of trauma from one generation to another is complex and must be understood in the whole. The generational transmission or transference discussed here operates at two levels: intergenerational and transgenerational’.28 Moreover:

The wilful denigration and destruction of Aboriginal ceremonial responsibilities and processes by the colonisers has therefore had profound transgenerational effects on the people of this land. Aboriginal people have been prevented from engaging in ceremonial processes for healing from trauma. The distressed feelings that accompany loss, death and devastation remain as destructive forces within the land and the people.29

Further, Wonnarua researcher Dr Karen Menzies writes:

Terms such as ‘collective trauma’ and ‘cultural bereavement’ extend beyond the individual to apply to a shared community response. The experience of collective trauma can be shaped by the group’s own past history, strengths and resilience. The notion of collective trauma offers an understanding of how trauma experiences of separation continue to impact on Aboriginal people as a group.30

In their work, leading Indigenous researchers Milroy, Dudgeon and Walker recognise three themes ‘covering the nature of the trauma that has occurred over many generations’ for Indigenous peoples and communities; these are ‘the extreme sense of powerlessness and loss of control; the profound sense of loss, grief and disconnection; and the overwhelming sense of trauma and helplessness’.31

The impacts of colonial policies on Indigenous people is evident today and is captured in the stories shared by Indigenous peoples and communities including, but not limited to, the testimonies provided by the Stolen Generations survivors in the Bringing Them Home Report, the evidence of Indigenous peoples’ and family members in the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, the experiences of children and young people in the NT legal system within the Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory and the evidence given by community members before the Yoorrook Justice Commission.

It is also a colonial legacy and an ongoing experience partially captured in the statistics that are consistently published in relation to Indigenous peoples’ social determinants that report experiences of ill-health, poverty, the over-representation of children in care and prisons, and the over-representation of men, women and children in the criminal justice system and in prisons and detention centres and suicide rates. While often referred to as ‘gaps’ and viewed through frameworks of ‘risks’, it is critical and timely to contextualise this statistical narrative within its colonial history.

Indigenous communities’ experiences of trauma and recognising colonial policies as the causal factor in historical, intergenerational and collective trauma are critical to understanding relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples, communities, services and institutions. A deeper and more rigorous engagement with historical colonial policies, and subsequent contemporary and compounding experiences of trauma through processes of truth-telling, is core to developing and supporting a shift towards a trauma-informed framework within the legal system. However, recognising and responding to this historical colonial legacy is also key in understanding current dominant institutional practices and processes which continue to privilege western Eurocentric knowledge and knowledge processes that exclude Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing. It is these systems which uphold whiteness as the norm and perpetuate structural and institutionalised racism, inflicting harm and violence and producing contemporary trauma.

1.3.2 Deficit Discourses

Deficit discourse is expressed in a mode of language that consistently frames Aboriginal identity in a narrative of deficiency. It is interwoven with notions of ‘authenticity’, which in turn adhere to models of identity still embedded within the race paradigm, suffering from all of its constraints but perniciously benefiting from all of its tenacity.32

— Cressida Fforde et al

Since the inception of colonisation, Indigenous communities have been subjected to oppressive colonial narratives embedded with deficit discourses that label and frame Indigenous peoples and communities as ‘problems’ and dysfunctional.33 These narratives have been the basis of historical assimilative policies which have sought to erode First Nations communities through processes of forced dislocation and removal. As Fforde et al observe: ‘Assumptions and accusations of Indigenous deficit have saturated the history of cultural relations in Australia since contact, and are a key component of racism and prejudice’.34

These narratives have objectified and subjugated Indigenous communities and knowledge systems which have labelled Indigenous people and culture as ‘savage’, ‘inferior’, ‘uncivilised’ and ‘dysfunctional’.35 Within child welfare these narratives have guided policy, particularly historical child removal on the grounds of ‘neglect’ and ‘protection’.36 These narratives have produced power imbalances in which non-Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing are privileged and cast as the ‘norm’ and superior, leading to intervention and surveillance of Indigenous life. The impact of these discourses on Indigenous peoples continues to be experienced today.

At present, deficit discourses continue which view Indigenous communities and peoples as ‘problems’, reinforce non-Indigenous power over Indigenous lives. These deficit discourses shape Indigenous experiences with institutions and ultimately fail to acknowledge and recognise Indigenous strength, resiliency, determination and agency. These narratives also re-produce blind spots whereby structural and institutional discrimination and circumstances are overlooked, excluded from knowledge production, or attached to Indigenous identity. This reproduces trauma as it silences Indigenous lived experiences and pathologises Indigenous communities and Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing. These deficit discourses also fail to recognise colonisation and the intergenerational, historical and collective traumatic impacts of colonial policies.

Ultimately, deficit discourses continue to silence and exclude Indigenous knowledges and peoples, which produces contemporary trauma. As proud Bunuba woman and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner June Oscar OM states in the Wiyi Yani U Thangani report:

The notion that we and our culture are to blame for the issues we face, or that because of the colour of our skin we are not Indigenous enough, has no basis in truth.

What it highlights is how dangerous simplistic, reductive and racist ideas of our society, culture and identity are. This is particularly the case when they have become entrenched, over generations, in the broader socio-economic and political systems that dominate and determine our existence.

It is well and truly time to end this historically entrenched deficit narrative.

In doing so my hope is that we can break the intergenerational cycles of poverty, inequality, trauma, racism and all forms of discrimination.37

1.3.3 Whiteness and Structural Racism

Indigenous peoples, families, communities, culture, knowledge systems, Ancestors and Country continue to be detrimentally and disproportionately affected by state, territory and federal legal systems. Clear evidence of this impact is reflected in annual statistics which highlight Indigenous over-representation in carceral and child protection systems, in addition to public inquiries including, but not limited to, the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, the Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory, the Yoorrook Justice Commission and the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families.

In working to effectively address this critical issue, it is imperative to consider institutionalised and structural racism and the role of whiteness within society and legal institutions, which maintain a biased assumption that continues to privilege western epistemologies and ontologies. As Goenpul woman and leading researcher Distinguished Professor Aileen Moreton-Robinson writes, ‘[i]n this way whiteness is constitutive of the epistemology of the West; it is an invisible regime of power that secures hegemony through discourse and has material effects in everyday life’.38

It is important to recognise that the dominant legal system has been developed primarily without Indigenous representation which has ensured an embedding and privileging of western knowledge and knowledge processes as the norm. This normalisation has ensured that Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing are excluded and marginalised. The legal system and legal profession have had, and continue to have, an instrumental role in the historical and ongoing policies and laws that affect Indigenous lives. As the Law Society of New South Wales recognises in Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Introductory Guidance and Strategies for the Legal Profession:

To bring an anti-racist perspective to the practice of law is to recognise that many institutions and systems which underpin the administration of justice in this country have been shaped by the history and ongoing impacts of dispossession and colonisation on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.39

This historical and contemporary role is crucial in addressing and responding to structural racism. In considering structural racism, it is useful to draw on the definition provided by First Nations lead researchers, Behrendt and Coombes in the Do Better report:

Structural racism (indirect discrimination) — occurs not through individual action but through policy, institutional culture, representations in media, laws, conversational norms and normalised behaviours. An example of structural racism is an informal expectation that players from non-white backgrounds be treated as natural athletes, rather than players with expertise and agency in the game.40

Further, the Law Society of New South Wales, in the report cited above states:

The sources of racism are multifaceted. Systemic racism can arise from and coexist with other forms of social disadvantage, for example the intersection of race and gender or race and disability. Racism may be overt or occur as a result of unconscious/implicit bias, namely where a person has an automatic preference or attitude towards a certain group based on learned stereotypes, without being conscious of that preference. Unconscious biases can also have structural/ institutional impacts, so that ‘the way things are done around here’ is not critically evaluated and reformed.41

Addressing whiteness and structural racism within the legal system, legal profession and legal practice is crucial and inextinguishable in working towards providing justice and competency for Indigenous peoples and communities to prevent ongoing harm, violence and trauma. To address structural racism, it is imperative to recognise and respond to the ways in which whiteness remains or is re-enforced as the norm which continues to exclude and marginalise Indigenous knowledges and ontologies.

1.3.4 Centring Indigenous Social and Emotional Wellbeing

Health does not just mean the physical well-being of the individual but refers to the social, emotional and cultural well-being of the whole community. This is a whole of life view and includes the cyclical concept of life-death-life. Health care services should strive to achieve the state where every individual can achieve their full potential as human beings and thus bring about the total well-being of their communities.

This is an evolving definition.42

Relationality is embodied through First Nations peoples’ connections to Country, family, kinship, non-human beings, Ancestors, community and culture. These connections are critical and determining of First Nations experiences of health and wellbeing.43 First Nations notions of health shift away from dominant biomedical models towards a holistic, collective and interconnected notion of wellbeing.44

For Indigenous peoples, the term and notion of social and emotional wellbeing (‘SEWB’) is privileged. It has been referred to by Gee et al as ‘[a] multidimensional concept of health that includes mental health, but which also encompasses domains of health and wellbeing such as connection to land, or “country”, culture, spirituality, ancestry, family, and community’.45 The concept of SEWB is reflected in Figure 1 produced by Gee et al.46

The nine guiding principles that underpin SEWB are: (1) ‘Health as holistic’; (2) ‘The right to self-determination’; (3) ‘The need for cultural understanding’; (4) ‘The impact of history in trauma and loss’; (5) ‘Recognition of human rights’; (6) ‘The impact of racism and stigma’; (7) ‘Recognition of the centrality of kinship’; (8) ‘Recognition of cultural diversity’; and (9) ‘The recognition of Aboriginal Strengths’.47

Figure 1: Social and Emotional Wellbeing Wheel48
Social and Emotional Wellbeing Wheel48

Across this continent, Indigenous peoples’ social and emotional wellbeing has been, and continues to be, impacted by political, social, historical, legal and cultural determinants caused by colonisation. The Seedling Group co-founders and directors, Nicole Tujague and Kelleigh Ryan, descendants of the Kabi Kabi people, explain, ‘as connection to Country is an essential element, a lack of connection can have a significant impact on overall health’.49 This highlights the ongoing harm of colonial policies such as forced dispossession, relocation and removal which has impacted on Indigenous peoples’ social and emotional wellbeing. Furthermore, as First Nations peoples belong and have obligations to Country, there is an interconnection which exists between the health of the person and the health of Country,50 as Nyungar and Martu woman, Emeritus Professor Joan Winch, writes, ‘[i]n our way of thinking, if the land is in bad repair, then so are the people. If the rivers dry up and become polluted, then this can be equated with the body’s lifeblood, and it means that life can’t be sustained.’51 This interconnection and holism exists between and across First Nations peoples and their connections to all their relations.52 In exploring this notion further, it is useful to consider the Family Is Culture Report which observed:

For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, ‘connection’ to family, community, culture and country is a fundamental concept which is central to one’s sense of identity, belonging and wellbeing. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people understand ‘connection’ to be gained through social experience and involves interaction with families, communities and ancestors associated with a particular area that is related to them. In this sense, ‘connection’ refers to interdependent and reciprocal relationships between Aboriginal peoples and country which is sustained through cultural knowledge and practices.53

Thus, the wellbeing of First Nations peoples is interconnected to the wellbeing of Country, and the wellbeing of Country is interconnected to First Nations people’s wellbeing which is based in a strong connection to culture supported, strengthened and nurtured through relationships with family, kin, Ancestors and community. This is evident in the work of Krakouer, Wise and Connolly who recognise, in relation to Indigenous children, ‘family and community connect the child to his or her culture’.54 Further, ‘[u]ltimately, culture, community, and family are inextricably linked and fundamental to Indigenous identity, development, and wellbeing’.55

Indigenous social and emotional wellbeing centred in relationality, connection and holism is critical to resilience. As Wiradjuri woman and researcher Amy Kennedy observes, ‘[c]onnection to both community and culture ensures an individual develops a strong sense of self, and a strong sense of self leads to individuals and communities drawing upon protective factors to become resilient in times of adversities’.56 Further Tujague and Ryan observe:

Knowing your culture is a protective factor, no matter where you come from in the world. Other protective factors of cultural identity include language, laws, ways of being, cultural rituals and ceremonies, religion, presence on land, or knowing where and to whom you belong.57

First Nations understandings, experiences and approaches to health and wellbeing are critical to legal decision-making, particularly in recognising and foreseeing the possible impacts of historical and contemporary laws, legal processes and outcomes on Indigenous lives, connections and wellbeing.

1.3.5 Indigenous Approaches to Healing

Despite the damage done to Aboriginal peoples and countries, the spirituality of this land remain strong. Connections have been damaged but they are not yet broken. Our Ancestors are still with us, teaching us and guiding us along the right path. And because the land holds memory, then for as long as it remains, nothing is ever truly lost.58

— Ambelin Kwaymullina

Across this continent, First Nations peoples continue to heal from the historical and contemporary individual and collective traumas which have been, and continue to be, inflicted against their Countries, cultures, families, Ancestors and communities.59 The Healing Foundation describes healing:

Healing enables people to address distress, overcome trauma and restore wellbeing. Ways to support healing include reconnecting with culture, strengthening identity, restoring safe and enduring relationships and supporting communities to understand the impact that their experiences have had on their behaviour and create change.

Healing occurs at a community, family and individual level. Healing continues throughout a person’s lifetime and across generations.

International best practice in healing involves combining traditional Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural healing practices with western methodologies.60

Healing is diverse, continuing and a lifelong process involving (re)connection and strengthening of First Nations relationships.61 Indigenous researchers Milroy, Dudgeon and Walker observe ‘three pathways to recovery’: ‘self-determination and community governance; reconnection and community life; and restoration and community resilience’.62

Ultimately, healing embodies First Nations strength, resiliency, knowledges, relationships, determination, agency and collectiveness. Critical to healing is the ongoing work undertaken by First Nations communities across this continent which continues to engage in cultural restoration, resurgence and revitalisation of Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing. As cultural burn practitioner Victor Steffensen observes:

Most people don’t realize that in many parts of Australia the land is very sick. There are weeds, damage from wildfires, land clearing, animals are declining, and in some places even grass is becoming scarce. When we look at the functioning of community in these places, they too are not at their fullest potential. Division within the community, racism, social issues, youth problems are just a few of the problems they face. The one thing that they all have in common is that people in these places are disconnected from their land and from practising their culture. People are not looking after country anymore and in return the country reflects the people. If people start looking after the land again there will certainly be a shift in a positive direction.

What the Indigenous fire work has demonstrated is that healing people and culture goes hand in hand with healing the landscape.63

As Tujague and Ryan observe:

Our ancestors live in our DNA, in our Country, the air we breathe, the food that fed our people, the songlines that told us stories of resilience and belonging. This ongoing connection was not made in one generation, but across thousands. It should not be disregarded or assumed to have disappeared because of the fracturing of the connection across a few generations as a result of colonisation.64

Further, the Wiyi Yani U Thangani Change Agenda for First Nations Gender Justice provides the following guiding definition:

(Re) learning; storying; grounding; connecting; surfacing; shifting: When we refer to actions with ‘(re)’, we are acknowledging that we are surfacing and igniting our ancestral ways of working, knowing, being and doing that draw on our millennial-old knowledge systems. Although for many of us we are doing these things for the first time, they are within our souls, resting in our chests ready to breathe new air. Through connection and cultural transmission, we recognise how our ancestral knowledges can be applied to life today, strengthening our identities and forming sustainable existences for everyone.65

This healing work is reflected in many ways: First Nations language revitalisation; efforts towards repatriation of Ancestors and cultural objects; advocacy work; returning to and caring for Country; approaches adopted by Aboriginal grassroots community organisations and services; caring for children, family and kin; listening to and learning from Elders; decolonising research methodologies; privileging and restoring First Nations epistemologies and ontologies; protecting Indigenous knowledges; engaging in the restoration of cultural practices; undertaking truth-telling; and Nation building.

These ways of knowing, being and doing embody the diversities which are embedded into place and lived experiences. They recognise and acknowledge healing as a journey and healing as (re)connection to community, culture and place.66 It is critical to listen to and learn from First Nations peoples’ experiences and knowledges to build trauma-informed and culturally safe frameworks that challenge the status quo and oppressive practices. This requires a shift towards privileging Indigenous relationality that nurtures healing, resiliency, wellbeing and self-determination.67

1.3.6 Towards Indigenous Self-Determination

Since the first days of British colonisation, First Nations have continued to enact their rights to govern and live according to their own law/lore, and to interact with the settler-state as sovereign and distinct self-defined collectives with inherent rights, distinct cultural identities and ongoing obligations to Country.68

Across history, First Nations have advocated for their aspirations, rights and responsibilities utilising diverse methods, processes and strategies,69 collectively articulating an aspiration for changed relations between the settler state and First Nations to enable First Nations ongoing political and cultural autonomy.70

As suggested in the Barunga and Uluru Statements, there is often a ‘generous’ invitation to settler Australia to understand the distinct cultures and worldviews that inform First Nations’ ongoing aspirations.71 While the methods used to realise changed relations with the state has shifted — whether First Nations have sought ‘equality’ or ‘citizenship’, constitutional recognition, Aboriginal-controlled bodies within Parliament, or treaty/treaties — the core aspirations are remarkably similar. Differences in the language and methods used fundamentally reflect the different contexts First Nations peoples were operating within.72

The language of ‘self-determination’ has only been taken on relatively recently by First Nations peoples to articulate their consistent aspirations around the ‘political realisation of their inextinguishable sovereignty’.73 As it stands today, there are multiple different and contested narratives of what ‘Indigenous self-determination’ constitutes both historically and currently.

Concepts of Indigenous-specific rights, including to ‘self-determination’, emerged in the post-World War II period, connected to strengthened discourses of liberalism and individual and state rights.74 Despite the ‘shortcomings’ of these concepts, Indigenous peoples globally have ‘harnessed the language and visions of self-determination discourses within international law and turned these to their own purposes’.75 The most significant example of this is the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (‘UNDRIP’), to which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples contributed,76 and which articulates the inherent right of indigenous peoples globally to ‘self-determination’, and the flow-on rights to ‘autonomy’ and ‘self-government’.77

Regardless of the specific ways in which First Nations peoples use the language of self-determination (and have embodied the concept more broadly), the ways in which the term has been translated into Australian government policy and legislation demonstrate significant departures. Compared to other settler-colonies, Australia is unique in its reticence to action forms of self-determination that align with Indigenous peoples’ articulations.78

In more recent decades, Australian governments have considered self-determination to be synonymous with ‘consultation’, ‘input’ or ‘inclusion’ of Indigenous peoples within policy, as opposed to a fundamental shift in relations or an expansion of recognised Indigenous jurisdiction. The ways in which self-determination has been understood closely relate to what Povinelli refers to as the ‘cunning of recognition’, in which settlers translate First Nations’ aspirations as only a desire for ‘recognition’ within settler legal and political systems, and not a broader autonomy.79

However, as seen through diverse strategies and public statements, First Nations are clear that they have not sought varied forms of ‘recognition’ to be subsumed within or by the settler state. Rather, as Euahleyai/Gamillaroi woman and Distinguished Professor Larissa Behrendt AO asserts, First Nations peoples largely have sought ‘recognition of sovereignty as an expression of distinct identity and a starting point for the exercise of self-determination as a way of achieving empowerment, autonomy and equality’.80

The term ‘self-determination’ is a useful shorthand if understood in the context of First Nations peoples’ ongoing and consistent advocacy for changed relations with the settler state to enable forms of cultural and political autonomy. Further, and regardless of government policy, self-determination will also continue to be ‘asserted, practised and maintained’ by First Nations peoples.81 Many Indigenous polities and communities are working to: rebuild and/or strengthen their institutions and processes for self-governance and self-government; define their priorities; strategically plan for and implement these priorities; and enter into mutually beneficial partnerships with settler governments and other entities; doing so in highly contested environments.82

In shifting away from a deficit narrative within legal institutions which reinforces whiteness and enacts institutionalised racism against First Nations life, it is imperative to work within and towards a framework that supports Indigenous self-determination as defined by and for First Nations peoples. In doing so, this requires departing from the norm that conforms to the status quo and reinforces power imbalances that fail to listen to Indigenous voices and that constrain First Nations agency.

Working towards a self-determination framework within the law requires a shift in approach that centres and privileges Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing. Further, it requires a deep understanding of ongoing colonisation and trauma, and it requires a commitment to listening and learning through and from Indigenous knowledges and knowledge processes that value lived experience, Indigenous leadership, community-based action, and strengths-based approaches. In doing so, judicial officers can begin to engage in truth-telling and respond to the harms which take place within the legal system that undermine Indigenous voices, experiences and aspirations. This Bench Book will explore how this can be achieved through legal practice and decision-making.

1.4 Moving away from Deficit Discourses

It is imperative that there is a shift away from deficit discourses which uphold whiteness and structural racism. This requires deep critical reflection, and action which disrupts dominant discourses and knowledge production and processes at both individual and structural levels. Within the legal system and legal practice, it is essential to challenge the status quo which re-enforces and upholds power imbalances and norms which continue to marginalise, exclude, silence and perpetuate violence against First Nations peoples and communities. The following sections of this chapter will explore some of the critical and pressing concerns and issues raised by Indigenous community members engaging with the legal system. The following chapters of this Bench Book will explore these issues in greater detail and nuance across specific legal practice areas.

The message arising out of this commentary highlights the crucial role for the legal system and legal professionals in undertaking work towards engaging in legal practice that is competent, critical, safe, ethical and just as defined by Indigenous peoples and communities. This work can begin with adopting a strengths-based and trauma-informed framework that engages with truth-telling, and seeks to listen, learn and be informed by Indigenous peoples and communities. This recognises Indigenous peoples and communities as experts in their lives and ways of being and doing, and values Indigenous lived experiences and relationality. This shift will challenge deficit discourses and knowledge processes which continue to harm Indigenous peoples, families and communities.

Without this shift at both personal and structural levels, the legal system will continue as a site which perpetuates violence against Indigenous life, producing and re-producing individual and collective trauma and intergenerational trauma for future generations. This harm against First Nations life is evidenced in the lived experiences shared by Indigenous people, and within the government statistics which consistently report Indigenous women, men and youth as over-represented within prison, and Indigenous children and families within the out-of-home-care system.83 In alleviating this harm and working towards justice for Indigenous peoples and communities, it is imperative that the legal system and legal professionals support Indigenous self-determination through privileging Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing.

1.5 Towards Responsibility

In shifting beyond deficit narratives and challenging the status quo, individuals and structures will begin to work towards a framework of responsibility. In moving towards a responsibility framework which will support Indigenous self-determination, individuals will engage in critical reflection and individual learning to unpack and challenge their underlying biases and gaps in knowledge. This can create a starting point to recognise and engage in opportunities for building and supporting healthy, respectful and balanced relationships with First Nations peoples, families, communities and Country through listening and learning that privileges Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing.

In doing so, individuals will begin to challenge dominant narratives and knowledge processes which cause harm, particularly unsafety and epistemic violence. This has the potential to disrupt the status quo which maintains whiteness and upholds structural racism. This disruption can begin a new way of thinking and working based on individual and collective responsibility which responds to the injustices which exist and persist.

1.6 Further Reading

1.6.1 Books

Atkinson, Judy, Trauma Trails, Recreating Song Lines: The Transgenerational Effects of Trauma in Indigenous Australia (Spinifex Press, 2000)

This book by Emeritus Professor Judy Atkinson AM, a Jiman and Bundjalung woman who also has Anglo-Celtic and German heritage, is based on a research study undertaken in Central Queensland during 1993–98 that analysed group narratives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities’ lived experiences of violence. Atkinson explores the transgenerational effects of trauma in Indigenous Australia that stem from colonial dispossession and the many ways this can be manifest. Moving away from rhetoric of victimhood, Atkinson re-establishes storytelling, dance and ceremony as ways of healing. Atkinson explores the value of Indigenous research methodologies of dadirri (deep, contemplative listening) and yimbaniyiara (listening to Elders) in working towards healing.

Avery, Scott, Culture Is Inclusion: A Narrative of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People with Disability (First Peoples Disability Network, 2018)

Culture Is Inclusion is written from the personal accounts of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with disability. Aboriginal scholar from the Worimi people, Dr Avery has compiled a narrative that ‘aims to unveil a mystery unknown to many Australians — the story of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with disability’. By combining traditional research methodologies with the concept of yarning, Avery’s research illustrates the complex concerns and disadvantage faced by First Nations people living with disability. The research was conducted in remote, regional and urban locations, with the issues addressed coming from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with disability themselves. Described by Avery as ‘an exploratory study, this research has laid out a business case to address the specific needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with disability’.

Behrendt, Larissa, Achieving Social Justice: Indigenous Rights and Australia’s Future (Federation Press, 2003)

Euahleyai/Gamillaroi woman and Distinguished Professor Larissa Behrendt AO argues that a broad Indigenous rights framework is crucial to achieving positive change to the socio-economic disadvantage into which Indigenous Australians are born. Behrendt explains why addressing problems in Indigenous communities at a practical level needs to be done in conjunction with rights protection. Redefining the relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians is a challenge that involves assessing the impact of historical injustice. It is only when we understand how the ideologies of colonialism have permeated today’s institutions that we can begin to break the grip of the historical legacy. Once that grip is broken, Australians will be free to explore alternatives to colonisation and assimilation.

Kwaymullina, Blaze, Tjalaminu Mia and Morgan Sally, Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit, and Creation (Fremantle Press, 2008)

Heartsick for Country is an anthology of personal accounts that speak to the love between First Nations peoples and their Country. The stories share knowledge, insight and emotion, each speaking of a deep connection to Country and a feeling of heartsickness because of the harm that is being inflicted on Country. Contributors highlight issues such as deforestation, the conversion of land to salt fields, the destruction of sacred rock art, the overuse of water in semi-arid areas, and the loss of species. The anthology calls for a shift in how the environment is understood and managed, emphasising the importance of Indigenous perspectives in addressing contemporary environmental challenges. The stories advocate protecting the land for future generations and highlight the need for sustainable, respectful relationships with Country.

Libesman, Terri, Katherine Ellinghaus and Paul Gray, ‘Colonial Law and its Control of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Families’ in Peter Cane, Lisa Ford and Mark McMillan (eds), The Cambridge Legal History of Australia (Cambridge University Press, 2022) 433

The persistence of state violence perpetrated against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families is evident from first contact with contemporary child welfare interventions. These interventions have been authorised by laws and policies which have forcefully separated children from their families and communities legally and illegally, and have separated families through exerting control over where they could live, who they could marry, and how their identity was legally defined. These laws and policies have also systematically excluded Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families from opportunities and benefits for wealth creation, laying the foundations for inter-generational experiences of poverty and trauma.

The shift from formal discrimination under the auspices of ‘protection’ to assimilation saw an increase in interventions and removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families. There is continuity across different laws and policies in the presumptions about Western family superiority, the embedding of non-Indigenous priorities and aspirations in law and policy, and the failure of the state to take responsibility for inter-generational harms perpetrated, or a willingness to relinquish power exercised over Aboriginal families.

McQuire, Amy, Black Witness: The Power of Indigenous Media (UQP, 2025)

Amy McQuire has been writing on Indigenous affairs since she was 17 years old. Over the past two decades, she has reported on most of the key events involving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, including numerous deaths in custody, the Palm Island uprising, the Bowraville murders and the Northern Territory Intervention. She has also exposed the misrepresentations and violence of the mainstream media’s reports, as well as their omissions and silences in regards to Indigenous matters. Black Witness showcases how journalism can be used to hold the powerful to account and make the world a more equitable place. This is the essential collection that we need right now — and always have.

Milroy, Jill, Pat Dudgeon, Jeannie Herbert and Darlene Oxenham, Us Women, Our Ways, Our World (Magabala Books, 2017)

Us Women, Our Ways, Our World is a collection of writings on women and Aboriginal identity from 14 senior Indigenous academics and community leaders. The collection engages with questions such as: What makes Aboriginal women strong? Why are grandmothers so important (even ones never met)? How is the connection to Country different for Aboriginal people compared to non-Aboriginal people’s love of nature or sense of belonging to an area? What is Aboriginal spirituality? These writings are generous, inclusive and considerate of the non-Aboriginal reader’s feelings. They are hopeful for the future, with an emphasis on acknowledging, joining with, collaborating and caring.

Moreton-Robinson, Aileen, ‘Whiteness, Epistemology and Indigenous Representation’ in Aileen Moreton-Robinson, Whitening Race: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism (Aboriginal Studies Press, 2004) 75

Dr Aileen Moreton-Robinson is a Goenpul woman of the Quandamooka people (Moreton Bay). This essay is part of a set of essays in the book, Whitening Race: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism, which focus on the topics of subjectivity, whiteness and ways of knowing, exploring how whiteness has shaped knowledge production. Moreton-Robinson critiques the way Indigenous scholars are rarely considered to be qualified and knowledgeable about whiteness, despite having first-hand, lived colonial experience of the role that whiteness plays in racialisation and the structure of society. Her essay argues that the white perspective is considered to be superior, having the status of an epistemological a priori in knowledge production, and that this influences the representation of and production of knowledge about Indigenous people. It discusses the way Indigenous people have been represented as objects and as the ‘known’, rather than subjects or as ‘knowers’, and that the writer-knower of knowledge as the subject carries an assumption of being racially ‘invisible’ yet is grounded in a white perspective.

Nakata, Martin N, Disciplining the Savages, Savaging the Disciplines (Aboriginal Studies Press, 2007)

Professor Nakata, a Torres Strait Islander academic, casts a critical gaze on the 1890s Cambridge Expedition researchers to the Torres Strait. Through his analysis of the linguistic, psychological, anthropological and other scientific projects of the expedition, Professor Nakata offers an astute critique of their research methods and interpretations, examining the way knowledge is produced within academic disciplines and then reproduced as public knowledge and used by governments. Nakata draws on Western educational theory to suggest ways that Indigenous knowledges can be empowered in contemporary education. He stresses the need to understand Indigenous positions within colonial regimes as complex and multifaceted, advocating for a deeper, more nuanced approach to Indigenous identity and knowledge systems at the intersection of history, tradition and modern political autonomy. Through this work, Nakata develops a strong discourse on Indigenous standpoint theory which has strongly influenced Indigenous research methodologies.

Povinelli, Elizabeth A, The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism (Duke University Press, 2002)

The Cunning of Recognition is an exploration of liberal multiculturalism from the perspective of Australian Indigenous social life. Elizabeth A Povinelli argues that the multicultural legacy of colonialism perpetuates unequal systems of power, not by demanding that colonised subjects identify with their colonisers but by demanding that they identify with an impossible standard of authentic traditional culture. Povinelli draws on 17 years of ethnographic research among northwest coast Indigenous people and her own experience participating in land claims, as well as on public records, legal debates and anthropological archives to examine how multicultural forms of recognition work to reinforce liberal regimes rather than open them up to a true cultural democracy.

Rademaker, Laura and Tim Rowse (eds), Indigenous Self-Determination in Australia: Histories and Historiography (ANU Press, 2020)

This book examines the complex history of Indigenous self-determination in Australia, exploring the policies of Protection and Assimilation which preceded the 1973 shift to Self-Determination. It challenges the clarity of these policies, explaining when they began, how they evolved, and whether they truly ended. Through a range of expert contributions, the book investigates how government policies and Indigenous agency intersect, focusing on areas such as land rights, local government, international law, education, health and identity.

Each of the contributors is a specialist in their topic. The contributors’ debate whether self-determination was ever fully realised or has continued in contemporary policy. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander advocates argue that self-determination has long been denied, pointing to historical narratives of colonial violence, and the ongoing inadequacies of 1970s-era policies which are constrained by underfunding and conservative opposition.

In addition to exploring these historical complexities, the book’s findings, stemming from a 2018 workshop funded by the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia, led to four key policy recommendations:

  • increased focus and funding for community-controlled adult education to build literacy, which is essential for financial literacy, governance and advocacy;

  • expanded Indigenous representation within government and supporting Indigenous organisations’ capabilities;

  • strengthened Indigenous control and influence, particularly through existing capital funds; and

  • legislation to ratify the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to ensure clear principles for future treaty processes.

These steps are seen as essential for empowering Indigenous peoples and fostering genuine self-determination.

Roach, Archie, Tell Me Why: The Story of My Life and My Music (Simon & Schuster, 2020)

This book is a powerful memoir by a true Australian legend. Not many people have lived as many lives as Archie Roach — stolen child, seeker, teenage alcoholic, lover, father, musical and lyrical genius, and leader — but it took him almost a lifetime to find out who he really was.

Roach was only two years old when he was forcibly removed from his family. Brought up by a series of foster parents until his early teens, his world imploded when he received a letter that spoke of a life he had no memory of.

In this intimate, moving and often shocking memoir, Archie’s story is an extraordinary odyssey through love and heartbreak, family and community, survival and renewal — and the healing power of music. Overcoming enormous odds to find his story and his people, Archie voices the joy, pain and hope he found on his path through song to become a legendary singer-songwriter and storyteller, beloved by fans worldwide.

Tell Me Why is a stunning account of resilience and the strength of spirit — and of a great love story.

Thunig, Amy (Gomeroi), Tell Me Again: A Memoir (UQP, 2022)

In this remarkable memoir, Amy narrates her journey through childhood and adolescence, growing up with parents who struggled with addiction and incarceration. She reveals the importance of extended family and community networks when your immediate loved ones are dealing with endemic poverty and intergenerational trauma. In recounting her experiences, she shows how the stories we tell about ourselves can help to shape and sustain us. Tell Me Again will captivate, move and inspire readers with its candour and insight.

Tucker, Margaret, If Everyone Cared Enough: Her Voice Reclaimed (National Library of Australia, 2024)

Margaret Liliardia Tucker MBE was a significant Aboriginal activist and one of the first Aboriginal women to publish for mainstream audiences.

Originally published in 1977, If Everyone Cared was a groundbreaking work that required significant alterations to cater to non-Indigenous readers who had limited knowledge of Aboriginal cultures and the consequences of settler invasion from a First Nations perspective. As a result, Tucker’s tone and content were modified, and her original Aboriginal storytelling voice was altered.

If Everyone Cared Enough draws from the handwritten manuscript held in the collections of the National Library of Australia, allowing readers to experience Tucker’s story as she originally wrote it. The republished autobiography commences with her joyful early memories of swimming, fishing and learning, but also delves into the abrupt end of her childhood when she was sent to the Cootamundra Domestic Training Home for Aboriginal Girls. Tucker fearlessly recounts the horrors of the training, the cruelty of her first employer, and the profound loneliness, homesickness and heartache she endured.

Throughout her life, Tucker remained dedicated to fighting for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander rights and opportunities. In 1932, she became the treasurer of the Victorian Aborigines League, one of the country’s first Aboriginal organisations. Her tireless efforts were recognised when she was awarded an MBE in 1968.

Tujague, Nicole and Kelleigh Ryan, Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2022)

This book provides an accessible resource for conducting culturally safe and trauma-informed practice with First Nations peoples in Australia. Designed by and for Australian Indigenous peoples, it explores psychological trauma and healing, and the clinical and cultural implications of the impacts of colonisation, through an Indigenous lens. It has been described as essential reading for Indigenous practitioners and service providers to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

The chapters take an Indigenous, yarning approach to sharing knowledge, and encourage readers to challenge their unconscious, long-held beliefs and worldviews. Nicole Tujague and Kelleigh Ryan identify the differences between dominant systems and more holistic Indigenous understandings of social and emotional health and wellbeing, and outline a meaningful practice framework for practitioners. They analyse types of complex trauma, including intergenerational, institutional, collective and historical trauma; and discuss the impacts of ongoing colonialism and racism and the concept of ‘cultural load’. They also address vicarious or ‘compassion’ trauma experienced by front-line workers and carers, and offer insights into their experience of working with collective healing programs.

Turnbull-Roberts, Vanessa, Long Yarn Short: We Are Still Here (UQP, 2024)

In this book, Vanessa Turnbull-Roberts embarks on an extraordinary work of truth-telling, exposing the ongoing violence visited on Black children, their families and their communities by the systems that claim to protect them. As a survivor of out-of-home care, a practising lawyer fighting for the freedom of others, and now also a mother herself, she takes an unflinching look at the heartache and trauma caused by racist family policing, the shameful rates of child removals, and the steady pipeline of First Nations children into the criminal justice system.

Long Yarn Short is a story of struggle, grief and love; a call to action from one of the most powerful voices of her generation. As a leading expert in children’s and young people’s rights, Vanessa invites readers to imagine solutions for a better world — a world of support and empowerment, not punishment — and demands that they listen when she says, ‘We are still here’.

Watson, Irene, Aboriginal Peoples, Colonialism and International Law: Raw Law (Routledge, 2014)

Professor Watson belongs to the Tanganekald, Meintangk, Bunganditj and Potaruwutj First Nations peoples. Her book assesses the legality and impact of colonisation from the viewpoint of Aboriginal law, rather than from that of the dominant Western legal tradition. The book begins by outlining an Aboriginal legal system as it is embedded in Aboriginal people’s complex relationship with their ancestral lands. This is Raw Law: a natural system of obligations and benefits, flowing from an Aboriginal ontology.

The book places ‘Raw Law’ at the centre of an analysis of colonisation — thereby decentring the usual analytical tendency to privilege the dominant structures and concepts of Western law. From the perspective of Aboriginal law, colonisation was a violation of the code of political and social conduct embodied in Raw Law, and its effects were damaging. It forced Aboriginal peoples to violate their own principles of natural responsibility to self, community, Country and future existence. The work calls for Aboriginal ways to be recognised in central discussions of colonial and postcolonial legality.

Watson, Nicole and Heather Douglas, Indigenous Legal Judgments: Bringing Indigenous Voices into Judicial Decision Making (Routledge, 2021)

This book examines 16 key legal decisions affecting Indigenous Australians which have been re-imagined so as to be inclusive of Indigenous peoples’ stories, historical experiences, perspectives and worldviews. Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars have collaborated to rewrite the decisions spanning 1889 to 2017, the judgments reflecting the trajectory of Indigenous people’s engagements with Australian law. Part 1 of the book explores sovereignty, Part 2 explores land and sea country, Part 3 explores racism and discrimination, Part 4 explores family and identity, and Part 5 explores criminalisation and criminal neglect.

1.6.2 Journal Articles

Anthony, Thalia, Gemma Sentance (Wiradjuri) and Larissa Behrendt (Euahleyai/Gamillaroi), “‘We’re Not Being Treated Like Mothers”: Listening to the Stories of First Nations Mothers in Prison’ (2021) 10(3) Laws 74

This article centres the lived experiences of over 160 First Nations women in NSW prisons. Most of these women are imprisoned for minor offences or are awaiting trial, with many serving short sentences. Notably, a significant number of these women are mothers, many of whom also have additional caregiving responsibilities.

The article highlights the ‘lived sentence’ of incarceration on First Nations women and its effects on their ability to fulfil their roles as mothers, grandmothers and community leaders.

Legal practitioners must recognise and understand the unique challenges faced by First Nations women, particularly in relation to their roles as grandmothers, mothers and caregivers. By viewing these women as individuals with distinct needs and by actively listening to their experiences, legal practitioners can challenge the systemic silencing and exclusion that often occurs in court processes, ensuring that the roles of these women as mothers and human beings are acknowledged, and that their voices are heard and valued. This approach is crucial in addressing the widespread feelings of belittlement and worthlessness, as expressed by First Nations women, and helping shift the focus from viewing these women as mere statistics to recognising their strength and resilience, and the impact of legal decisions on their families (page 87).

This research stresses the importance of centring the voices of Indigenous women in policy and reform efforts. Their leadership and perspectives are crucial in advocating for systemic change. There is an urgent need to consider alternative sentencing options, which would allow Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women to remain out of prison, where they can fulfil their caregiving roles, nurture their families, and lead their communities effectively.

Krakouer, Jacynta, Sarah Wise and Marie Connolly, ‘‘‘We Live and Breathe Through Culture”: Conceptualising Cultural Connection for Indigenous Australian Children in Out-of-Home Care’ (2018) 71(3) Australian Social Work 265

This article argues that the placement of Indigenous children in out-of-home care (‘OOHC’) poses a significant threat to cultural connection, which is fundamental to Indigenous identity and wellbeing. It highlights the vital importance of cultural connection for Indigenous child development, explaining that family connection strengthens cultural connection, and is therefore as important to children’s needs in OOHC as placement stability.

The authors note that the historical and contemporary legislative approaches of Indigenous child protection in Australia, which view Indigenous children’s best interests through a Western lens, are problematic and harmful to cultural connection. They contend that the statutory and community organisations responsible for Indigenous children in OOHC must focus on facilitating and strengthening family relationships, not only to foster cultural connection, but also to explore reunification possibilities. This involves ensuring that:

  • carers are culturally competent;

  • the fundamental importance of culture is better understood by workers placing children in care;

  • collaboration between Aboriginal community-controlled organisations and non-Indigenous agencies is improved; and

  • family is seen as pertinent to the development of a strong cultural identity and connection to Indigenous heritage.

This approach can help reduce the number of Indigenous children in care, which continues to rise at a high and disproportionate rate.

Menzies, Karen, ‘Understanding the Australian Aboriginal Experience of Collective, Historical and Intergenerational Trauma’ (2019) 62(6) International Social Work 1522

Dr Karen Fiona Menzies, a Wonnarua woman, writes on the importance for trauma-informed approaches to addressing Indigenous justice, including in the ways that child protection, health, legal, welfare and social work professionals interact with Indigenous people. She explains how a trauma-informed approach requires recognition and reflection on the ways in which individuals and the government have perpetrated harm to Indigenous people. It is argued that treatment of the symptoms of trauma, including health and social inequity, can never be truly effective if underlying trauma is not addressed.

The article explores the way trauma impacts the health and inequity of Indigenous people, including the impact of childhood trauma, historical and ongoing colonial trauma, and collective and generational trauma from the forced separation and assimilation of Indigenous people.

Newton, BJ, ‘Understanding Child Neglect in Aboriginal Families and Communities in the Context of Trauma’ (2019) 24(2) Child & Family Social Work 218

In this article, Wiradjuri woman and research fellow BJ Newton argues that in order to meet the needs of Aboriginal families and communities where there is child neglect, policy and practice needs to acknowledge and address the impact of trauma in shaping the lived experiences of Aboriginal people. The article addresses a gap in the literature which, she argues, fails to adequately address child neglect within Aboriginal families and communities in the context of historical trauma.

The article breaks down the different definitions and theories of child neglect, the importance of cultural relativism in assessing child neglect, the experiences of trauma within and across Aboriginal communities caused by dispossession and government intervention and the impacts which these have on child neglect, as well as the underlying implications for individuals working with Aboriginal families and communities. Overall, Newton advocates for an ecological approach which views child neglect through a lens of trauma. This involves looking at a family’s strengths and vulnerabilities, at individual, interpersonal and environmental circumstances, and at relationships.

Turnbull-Roberts, Vanessa, Michael Salter and BJ Newton, ‘Trauma Then and Now: Implications of Adoption Reform for First Nations Children’ (2021) 27(2) Child & Family Social Work 163

This article on Aboriginal trauma scholarship and decolonising methodologies situates the contemporary state removal of Aboriginal children against the backdrop of the historical policies that actively sought to disrupt Aboriginal kinship and communities. It undertakes a thematic analysis of submissions made by Aboriginal community controlled organisations to the 2018 Australian Senate Inquiry into Local Adoption to highlight the failure of federal and state reforms to address four key issues:

  • the implications of intergenerational trauma;

  • the impact of adoption on Aboriginal kinship and identity;

  • the principle of self-determination; and

  • alternative solutions to reduce child removal and support Aboriginal children in out-of-home care.

Through this analysis, the article amplifies the voices of Aboriginal child protection agencies that were silenced in debates over adoption law reform and underscores the need to legitimately honour First Nations voices in policy and legislative decisions affecting Aboriginal children.

1.6.3 Reports/Discussion Papers

Baldry, Eileen, Ruth McCausland, Leanne Dowse and Elizabeth McEntyre, A Predictable and Preventable Path: Aboriginal People with Mental and Cognitive Disability in the Criminal Justice System (Report, 2015)

This report presents both quantitative and qualitative findings of an Australian Research Council Linkage grant examining the significant over-representation of mental and cognitive disability in Aboriginal people incarcerated in New South Wales and the Northern Territory. It draws on comprehensive quantitative data sourced from multiple criminal legal system and human services agencies in New South Wales, and qualitative insights from New South Wales and the Northern Territory, in order to analyse the interactions of systems and responses to the complex needs of Aboriginal people with disability in criminal legal systems. It also provides case studies and a series of ‘nested’ studies to provide insights into specific aspects of these issues.

The report ‘provides innovative theoretical and applied knowledge that can assist in the reduction of the unacceptably high level of Aboriginal people with mental and cognitive disabilities in Australian criminal justice systems’ (page 9). Quantitative findings from the study include that Indigenous women and men with mental health disorders and cognitive disability:

  • ‘experience multiple, interlocking and compounding disadvantageous circumstances’;

  • experience ‘early and frequent contact with criminal justice agencies’; and

  • have needs that are ‘particularly acute and poorly serviced by past and current policy and program approaches’ (page 10).

Qualitative findings illustrate that ‘[i]nstitutional racism, stigma and discrimination are common, marginalising and destructive experiences for Aboriginal people with mental and cognitive disabilities’ (page 11).

Of particular interest to judicial officers is the discussion in sections 9.1 (‘Legal issues’) and 10 (‘Recommendations and solutions’), including:

  • 10.1 (‘Overarching principles’); and

  • 10.2.1–10.2.7 (‘Service responses — criminal justice’).

This is a review conducted by Distinguished Professor Larissa Behrendt and Professor Lindon Coombes into the Collingwood Football Club’s processes of dealing with racism following allegations of racial discrimination by an ex-football player of the club. The review sought to determine how effectively the club responded to allegations of racism, whether there were appropriate supports to effectively respond to allegations, and what changes to the policies, processes and systems of the club were required to improve its response to racism in the future.

The key areas of reform involved developing club values; having proactive responses to racism; improving policies, procedures and mechanisms for complaints; promoting diversity and anti-racism in employment and recruitment processes; ensuring a culturally safe workplace; addressing past acts of racism; incorporating truth-telling about the impacts of racism, ensuring oversight; and developing community leadership.

The Family Is Culture review led by Professor Megan Davis, a Cobble Cobble and South Sea Islander woman, investigated the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and young people in out-of-home care (‘OOHC’) in New South Wales. The report examines the high rates of Aboriginal children and young people that are in OOHC in New South Wales and the implementation of the Aboriginal Child Placement Principle.

The report exposes racism and a lack of accountability within the system and establishes a path to reform, putting forward 126 recommendations on how the system needs to be improved to prevent harm to children and enhance their experience in OOHC. These recommendations are focused on, among many areas:

  • strengthening self-determination;

  • investing in family support services;

  • increasing government accountability and public oversight;

  • promoting early intervention support and enhancing connection to family, community, culture and country.

The report particularly highlights:

  • the importance of judicial oversight, as it ensures the Department complies with legislative requirements and holds them accountable for their decisions, such as those related to removal or placement (page 100);

  • the need for more transparency in the Children’s Court to ensure public confidence in the justice system, while balancing the need to protect the privacy of children involved in proceedings. This aligns with recommendations 12–14 which relate to better and more accessible records of Children’s Court proceedings (pages 121, 131); and

  • the need for stricter adherence to ethical guidelines and the NSW government’s Model Litigant Policy to ensure transparency and fairness in the court process. The review identified multiple allegations that FACS caseworkers provided false or misleading information in care and protection proceedings, including claims of excluding relevant information and misrepresenting family circumstances (page 381).

Edwige, Vanessa (Ngarabal) and Paul Gray (Wiradjuri), Significance of Culture to Wellbeing, Healing and Rehabilitation (Report, Bugmy Bar Book Committee, June 2021)

The Bugmy Bar Book Committee commissioned this report ‘to collate research regarding the significance of culture to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and the significant benefits of connecting to culture, family and community as part of culturally appropriate treatment and care to promote wellbeing, rehabilitation and healing’ (p. 3).

The report outlines the importance of culture to rehabilitation and healing. It explores meanings of social and emotional wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people; explains the relationship between healing and culture, including in relation to recidivism and recovery, and in terms of cultural safety in service provision; and identifies the impacts of imprisonment on individuals with cognitive or psychiatric disabilities, and on imprisoned people’s children and families.

The report finds that ‘systems and approaches that lack cultural competence and grounding are likely to exacerbate existing challenges and perpetuate cycles of harm’ (page 6). To assist in the design of effective systems and programs that promote healing and rehabilitation, the report ‘identifies key characteristics to promote healing and wellbeing, including self-determination and the application of trauma-informed principles’ (page 6). The report includes illustrative case studies of culturally appropriate approaches to healing and recovery throughout.

Fogarty, William, Melissa Lovell, Juleigh Langenberg and Mary-Jane Heron, Deficit Discourse and Strengths-Based Approaches: Changing the Narrative of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health and Wellbeing (Report, Lowitja Institute, 2018)

This report explores strengths-based approaches to shifting the deficit narrative in the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health sector (page vi). The study identifies national and international approaches to change deficit-based narratives of Indigenous’ peoples’ health and wellbeing ‘to one of strength and resilience’ (page vi). It summarises characteristics of best practice in strengths-based discourse, and makes recommendations to reframe discourse in the Australian health context.

The report provides background on both deficit discourses and strengths-based approaches, and what they look like in operation. It also provides illustrative examples of strengths-based health programs. A summary of conclusions is provided (page viii). These include emerging evidence of the adverse impact of deficit discourse on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ health and wellbeing; and justifications for and barriers to meaningfully adopting strengths-based models and approaches.

Gee, Graham et al, ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing’ in Pat Dudgeon, Helen Milroy and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Report, 2014) 55

The second and most recent edition of Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice offers a comprehensive examination of issues and strategies influencing the mental health and emotional wellbeing of First Nations peoples. The report draws together culturally appropriate information to educate and assist health professionals who provide services to Indigenous peoples experiencing mental health and social and emotional wellbeing (‘SEWB’) concerns.

Chapter 4 of the report, ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing’, helps readers better understand the history and context of these issues. This chapter provides a First Nations perspective on SEWB, with the aim of highlighting the relationship between maintaining cultural connections and mental health. The report defines SEWB as a multidimensional concept that includes mental health but also encompasses domains of health and wellbeing such as connection to Country, culture, spirituality, Ancestry, family and community. The authors situate the domains and guiding principles which typically characterise SEWB within a framework that places Indigenous world views and culture as central, and explores how these principles may be applied in a practical setting.

This report responds to the crisis of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women’s over-imprisonment, which is causing immeasurable harm. It puts forward 18 recommendations to redress racialised and gendered justice system outcomes. It also calls for strategies to be designed, implemented and evaluated in partnership with First Nations women, consistent with principles of community control and self-determination.

The report focuses on the criminal justice system and the importance of responding to the distinct rights, histories and circumstances of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women, which are different to those of men. The report argues that violence against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women, which contributes directly and indirectly to women’s offending, needs to be addressed to reduce the number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in the criminal justice system, both as victim/survivors and offenders. It also contends that strategies implemented by governments must be responsive to the vital roles Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women play in their communities and families, including as primary carers of children.

To better support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women, courts can address systemic issues such as inadequate legal representation, biased bail decisions, and the punitive nature of legal processes. By focusing on diversionary programs, culturally appropriate services, and ensuring women are not left unsupported, courts can shift away from punitive systems and adopt more empowering, rehabilitative approaches that recognise the vital roles women play in their families and communities.

Jones, Jocelyn et al, Wangkiny Yirra ‘Speaking Up’ Project: First Nations Women and Children with Disability and their Experiences of Family and Domestic Violence (Research Report, Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability, June 2023)

This research engaged with First Nations women and children in Western Australia, to understand their experiences of family and domestic violence (‘FDV’), the risk factors they face, and the barriers to accessing support services. It aimed to identify effective programs and make recommendations for culturally safe, preventative measures.

The study, based on participatory action research and culturally safe methods, revealed key concerns such as the lack of culturally secure services, inadequate training in mainstream services, and systemic barriers in accessing disability support and FDV services for women and children who have experienced family and domestic violence. Women reported experiencing multiple forms of violence, often leading to disability, mental illness and social isolation. Children faced emotional and educational challenges, while carers were overburdened.

Recommendations include reforming systems such as the National Disability Insurance Agency, child protection, and justice to better serve First Nations women and children with disabilities. The report calls for investment in culturally secure services, better data collection, and increased funding for Aboriginal community controlled organisations to ensure effective support.

Libesman, Terri et al, Parents with Disability and Their Experiences of Child Protection Systems (Research Report, Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability, 11 July 2023)

This report was commissioned by the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability. Its findings are informed by a review of national and international literature, a review of Australian policy and practice, and available quantitative data and fieldwork conducted in New South Wales and Victoria.

The report ‘presents evidence about individual, family and structural factors that drive the over-representation of parents with disability in child protection systems. It makes recommendations for reforms that address underlying social and economic vulnerabilities. It also recommends reforms to child protection laws, policies and practice to better respect the human rights of parents with disability and to improve the effectiveness of child protection systems for parents with disability, their children, families, communities and others engaged with them. While finding that child protection systems need to be fully overhauled, and that supports and systems beyond the child protection system which impact the underlying drivers of engagement with child protection systems also require significant reform, the report also makes recommendations with respect to reforms of existing systems. These reforms, which can be implemented in the short term until such time as deeper structural reforms are implemented, will significantly improve compliance with minimum human rights standards’ (page 8).

Of particular interest to judicial officers are:

  • Chapter 5 on the legal system and chapters 10 and 11 on experiences of child protection legal systems, detailing specific issues and denials of justice that arise in child protection legal systems for parents with disability; and

  • Chapter 6 on better practice and Part III ‘Summary and recommendations’. These detail necessary changes to ‘child protection services and decision-making with respect to parents with disability who have contact with child protection system’ (page 20) and make recommendations to align child protection systems with minimum human rights principles.

McLeod, Josephine, Libby Gunn and Nick Devereaux, Women in Native Title: Native Title Report 2024 — Community Guide (Report, Australian Human Rights Commission, April 2024)

The report is an account of the experiences, perspectives, aspirations and solutions of First Nations women within the native title system. It takes a person-centred approach, highlighting how native title and related systems impact individuals and communities on a day-to-day basis. A key finding from the First Nations women participants is the inability for the native title system to facilitate the fulfillment of First Nations peoples’ rights to culture, property, procedural fairness, self-determination and non-discrimination.

The report calls for significant reform of the native title system to deliver land justice and fulfil human rights such as self-determination, participation, culture and non-discrimination. The report includes 29 recommendations and emphasises the need for the supported participation of First Nations women and their communities in any future reform work.

Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (Final Report, April 1991) vol 1

The Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody examined 99 deaths of Aboriginal people that occurred in custody between January 1980 and May 1989. The Commission investigated and reported on the manner and circumstances of each death, as well as broader investigations into the social, cultural and legal factors that may have contributed to the deaths.

The Final Report, released in April 1991, concluded that First Nations peoples had a higher chance of dying in custody simply because they had a higher chance of being in custody. A central finding was that continuing conditions of over-representation of First Nations peoples in prisons had their ‘origins in structural, systemic injustice to a disadvantaged minority rather than in a propensity in this group to increased criminality’. In other words, what differs is not the behaviour of First Nations peoples compared to non-Indigenous people, but the discriminatory and violent ways in which they are treated. The report’s 339 recommendations fall into two main categories:

  • those focused on improving the interaction of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples at first contact with police and the justice system; and

  • those addressing policies such as health, education and self-determination in recognition of the broader social issues leading to higher rates of incarceration.

Chapters 7–10 focus on various aspects of the criminal justice and custodial processes and emphasise the importance of including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and their voices in all matters.

The Final Report made 222 recommendations on how to improve laws, policies, structures and practices to ensure a more inclusive and just society that supports the independence of people with disability and their right to live free from violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation.

Volume 9 of the report is titled ‘First Nations People with Disability’. Five research reports were published specific to the experiences of First Nations people with a disability (described on pages 21–3):

  • Something Stronger: Truth-Telling on Hurt and Loss, Strength and Healing, from First Nations People with Disability;

  • Care Criminalisation of Children with Disability in Child Protection Systems;

  • Wangkiny Yirra ‘Speaking up’ Project: First Nations Women and Children with Disability and Their Experiences of Family and Domestic Violence;

  • Options to Improve Service Availability and Accessibility for First Nations People with Disability; and

  • Parents with Disability and Their Experiences of Child Protection Systems.

The following sections of vol 9 provide practical advice on how to better the experience of Indigenous people within the child protection and criminal justice systems:

  • 5.4 The need for a First Nations approach (pages 124–7) (on cultural safety in child protection processes)

  • 6.4 Culture is healing (pages 144–6)

  • 6.5 ‘Culturally safe screening (pages 147–8).

This report provides a national overview of the mental health needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. It provides ideas on how to improve the general wellbeing of Indigenous Australians, encompassing mental, physical, socio-cultural and spiritual health. The research is guided by the primary principle that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have great strengths. In addition (page 7):

  • self-determination must be central to all matters;

  • cultural understandings must shape the provision of services;

  • the human rights of Indigenous Australians must be upheld;

  • racism, stigma, environmental adversity and social disadvantage negatively impact wellbeing and should be remedied;

  • a recognition of family and kinship systems must be centred; and

  • the diversity of the various Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander nations should be recognised.

Based on extensive consultation with Aboriginal peoples around Australia regarding mental health, including both service providers and service users, the report details a National Aboriginal Mental Health Policy and Plan (pages 24–6) and a series of required policy initiatives to implement it (pages 27–9).

Wiyi Yani U Thangani (Women’s Voices), Securing Our Rights, Securing Our Future (Report, Australian Human Rights Commission, December 2020)

This study, led by the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner and Bunuba woman June Oscar AO, investigated how to best promote the human rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and girls and their communities. The report champions and elevates the voices of communities, women and girls in respect of what principles they believe need to underscore the design of policies, programs and services aimed at securing their human rights now and into the future. This process reflects the central aim of Wiyi Yani U Thangani: ‘to define our women and girls in their own image, determined by them’. The report advocates for systemic and social change that embeds First Nations cultures and knowledge systems through strengths-based community-driven approaches to addressing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage.

The Yoorrook Justice Commission was Australia’s first formal Indigenous-led truth-telling process. In 2023, the Commission published its second interim report, which explores systemic injustices, racism, discriminatory laws and policy failures in the child protection and criminal justice systems.

As part of the inquiry, Yoorrook gathered a significant amount of evidence from the community through formal submissions, hearings and roundtable discussions. Across both the child protection and criminal justice systems, the report documents serious deficits in three key areas that are critical to promoting self-determination and to ending the systemic injustices that the State has inflicted and continues to inflict on First Nations Peoples: monitoring and accountability; cultural competence and responsiveness, including human rights capability; and the need to strengthen human and cultural rights compliance.

The report makes 46 recommendations across five categories:

  • transformative change to the child protection and the criminal justice systems through the treaty process;

  • urgent actions across both the child protection and criminal justice systems relating to accountability, cultural competency and responsiveness, and strengthening compliance with human and cultural rights obligations;

  • urgent reforms to the child protection system;

  • urgent reforms to the criminal justice system; and

  • legislative reforms required to enable Yoorrook to fulfill its mandate for truth-telling.

1.6.4 Other Resources

Behrendt, Larissa (Euahleyai/Gamillaroi) (Director), After the Apology (Pursekey Productions, 2017)

Suellyn thought FACS would only remove children in extreme cases until her own grandchildren were taken. Hazel decided to take on the FACS system after her fourth grandchild was taken into state care. Jen Swan was raising her grandchildren until she was deemed unsuitable by FACS. The rate of Indigenous child removal has increased at an exponential rate since Prime Minister Kevin Rudd delivered the apology to the Stolen Generations in 2008. Hazel started Grandmothers Against Removals as a response to the rising rates of child removal and along the way she has been joined by families across Australia in the battle to bring the kids home. Together they are not only taking on the system, they are changing it.

Behrendt, Larissa (Euahleyai/Gamillaroi) (Director), The First Inventors (SBS, 2023)

The First Inventors is a four-part documentary series exploring 65,000 years of Aboriginal Australian invention, looking at how landscapes were transformed, how events were recorded, the use of navigation tools, and how societies were organised. In a conversation with NITV Radio, Professor Chris Wilson, co-presenter of The First Inventors, says that the documentary is showing the rest of the community what Indigenous science is, what Indigenous knowledge is and Indigenous archaeology.

BlakCast Podcast Network, Coming Out, Blak (Podcast, 2020–24)

Coming Out, Blak was a podcast dedicated to supporting and celebrating First Nations mob in the LGBTQ+ community.

Newell, Maya (Director), (2020), In My Blood It Runs (Closer Productions, 2020)

In My Blood It Runs was shot in Mparntwe (Alice Springs), Sandy Bore Homeland and Borroloola Community in the Northern Territory over three and a half years. However, the director, Maya Newell, had been making films alongside Arrernte Elders and families at two Arrernte-led NGOs — Akeyulerrre and Children’s Ground — for over a decade preceding the inception of this film. In My Blood It Runs rose organically from those relationships, and the film team want to acknowledge the deep trust and support from these core partner organisations who backed the telling of this story.

Ten-year-old Dujuan is a child-healer and good hunter and speaks three languages. As he shares his wisdom of history and the complex world around him, we see his spark and intelligence. Yet Dujuan is ‘failing’ in school and facing increasing scrutiny from welfare authorities and the police. As he travels perilously close to incarceration, his family fight to give him a strong Arrernte education alongside his Western education lest he becomes another statistic. We walk with him as he grapples with these pressures, shares his truths and somewhere in between finds space to dream, imagine and hope for his future self.

Perkins, Rachel (Arrernte and Kalkadoon) (Director), The Australian Wars (Blackfella Films for SBS, 2022)

Acclaimed three-part documentary series The Australian Wars powerfully examines the battles fought on home soil as the British colonial front pushed forward, and First Nations peoples resisted. It was recognised with awards for Best Direction in Non-Fiction Television, Best Documentary or Factual Program and Best Editing in a Documentary Program at the 2024 Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts awards.

Perkins journeyed across the continent to explore the breadth of warfare, strategy and forceful resistance that occurred, revealing new evidence and challenging the way conflicts are recognised in the Australian War Memorial.

Spearim, Boe (Gamilaraay and Kooma) Frontier War Stories (Podcast, 2020–24)

Boe Spearim is a Gamilaraay and Kooma radio host and podcaster who lives in Brisbane. Frontier War Stories is a podcast dedicated to truth-telling about a side of Australia that has been left out of the history books. Each episode, Boe speaks with different Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people about research, books and oral histories which document the first 140 years of conflict and resistance. These times are the Frontier Wars and these are our War Stories.

The Healing Foundation, Glossary of Healing Terms (Poster, July 2020)

The Glossary of Healing Terms was created by The Healing Foundation, a national First Nations organisation which plays a vital role in supporting Stolen Generations survivors and their families, ensuring their voices are heard and their healing is prioritised. Its work is essential in addressing the ongoing trauma caused by colonisation, and its focus on trauma-informed practices should be recognised for its contribution to the healing of First Nations communities.

This Glossary is a guide to key terms related to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander healing. It was produced to promote discussion and knowledge sharing and includes a collection of terms commonly used in the healing space. It is not a definitive list of terms associated with healing, but a way to start the conversation on healing.



1Martin Nakata (Torres Strait Islander), Disciplining the Savages, Savaging the Disciplines (Aboriginal Studies Press, 2007); Aileen Moreton-Robinson (Goenpul woman of the Quandamooka People), ‘Towards an Australian Indigenous Women’s Standpoint Theory: A Methodological Tool’ (2013) 28(78) Australian Feminist Studies 331; Ambelin Kwaymullina (Palyku), Indigenous Standpoints, Indigenous Stories, Indigenous Futures: Narrative from an Indigenous Standpoint in the Twenty-First Century and Beyond (PhD Thesis, University of Western Australia, 2017).

2Lyn Henderson-Yates (Aboriginal woman from the Shadforth family in Derby, West Kimberley), ‘Are You One of Those Throw Backs? The Invisibility of a Fair-Complexioned Aboriginal Woman’ in Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Jeannie Herbert, Jill Milroy (Palyku) and Darlene Oxenham (Malgana), (eds), Us Women, Our Ways, Our World (Magabala Books, 2017) 205.

3Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Michael Wright, Yin Paradies (Wakaya), Darren Garvey and Iain Walker, ‘Aboriginal Social, Cultural and Historical Contexts’ in Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku) and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014) 3.

4Martin Nakata (Torres Strait Islander), ‘Identity Politics: Who Can Count as Indigenous?’ in Michelle Harris, Martin Nakata (Torres Strait Islander) and Bronwyn Carlson (eds), The Politics of Identity: Emerging Indigeneity (UTS ePress, 2013) 125, 134–5.

5Judy Atkinson (Jiman/Bundjalung), Trauma Trails, Recreating Song Lines: The Transgenerational Effects of Trauma in Indigenous Australia (Spinifex Press, 2002); Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku) and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014); Eduardo Duran (Pache/Tewa/Lakota), Healing the Soul Wound: Trauma-Informed Counselling for Indigenous Communities (Teachers College Press, 2nd ed, 2019); Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023).

6Aileen Moreton-Robinson (Goenpul woman of the Quandamooka People), ‘Relationality: A Key Presupposition of an Indigenous Social Research Paradigm’ in Jean M O’Brien and Chris Andersen (eds), Sources and Methods in Indigenous Studies (Routledge, 2017) 69, 71.

7Marcelle Burns (Gomeroi-Kamillaroi), ‘Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria, Judgment’ in Nicole Watson (Birri Gubba and Munanjali) and Heather Douglas (eds), Indigenous Legal Judgments: Bringing Indigenous Voices into Judicial Decision Making (Routledge, 2021) 97; Mary Graham (Kombumerri), ‘Aboriginal Notions of Relationality and Positionalism: A Reply to Weber’ (2014) 4(1) Global Discourse 17; Aileen Moreton-Robinson (Goenpul woman of the Quandamooka People), ‘Relationality: A Key Presupposition of an Indigenous Social Research Paradigm’ in Jean M O’Brien and Chris Andersen (eds), Sources and Methods in Indigenous Studies (Routledge, 2017) 69; Mia Tjalaminu (Mineng and Goreng), Blaze Kwaymullina (Palyku) and Sally Morgan (Palku and Nyamal) (eds), Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit, and Creation (Fremantle Press, 2008).

8Marcelle Burns (Gomeroi-Kamillaroi), ‘Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria, Judgment’ in Nicole Watson (Birri Gubba and Munanjali) and Heather Douglas (eds), Indigenous Legal Judgments: Bringing Indigenous Voices into Judicial Decision Making (Routledge, 2021) 97; Mary Graham (Kombumerri), ‘Aboriginal Notions of Relationality and Positionalism: A Reply to Weber’ (2014) 4(1) Global Discourse 17; Aileen Moreton-Robinson (Goenpul woman of the Quandamooka People), ‘Relationality: A Key Presupposition of an Indigenous Social Research Paradigm’ in Jean M O’Brien and Chris Andersen (eds), Sources and Methods in Indigenous Studies (Routledge, 2017) 69; Mia Tjalaminu (Mineng and Goreng), Blaze Kwaymullina (Palyku) and Sally Morgan (Palku and Nyamal) (eds), Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit, and Creation (Fremantle Press, 2008); Irene Watson (Tanganekald, Meintangk, Bunganditj and Potaruwutj) , Aboriginal Peoples, Colonialism and International Law: Raw Law (Routledge, 2014).

9Irene Watson (Tanganekald, Meintangk, Bunganditj and Potaruwutj), Aboriginal Peoples, Colonialism and International Law: Raw Law (Routledge, 2014) 5.

10Lauren Tynan (Trawlwulwuy), ‘What Is Relationality? Indigenous Knowledges, Practices and Responsibilities with Kin’ (2021) 28(4) Cultural Geographies 597, 597.

11Bob Morgan (Gamilaroi), ‘Country: A Journey to Cultural and Spiritual Healing’ in Mia Tjalaminu (Mineng and Goreng), Blaze Kwaymullina (Palyku) and Sally Morgan (Palku and Nyamal) (eds), Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit, and Creation (Fremantle Press, 2008) 202, 202.

12Bob Morgan (Gamilaroi), ‘Country: A Journey to Cultural and Spiritual Healing’ in Mia Tjalaminu (Mineng and Goreng), Blaze Kwaymullina (Palyku) and Sally Morgan (Palku and Nyamal) (eds), Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit, and Creation (Fremantle Press, 2008) 202, 202.

13Mary Graham (Kombumerri), ‘Aboriginal Notions of Relationality and Positionalism: A Reply to Weber’ (2014) 4(1) Global Discourse 1, 3.

14Lauren Tynan (Trawlwulwuy), ‘What Is Relationality? Indigenous Knowledges, Practices and Responsibilities with Kin’ (2021) 28(4) Cultural Geographies 597, 601.

15Lauren Tynan (Trawlwulwuy), ‘What Is Relationality? Indigenous Knowledges, Practices and Responsibilities with Kin’ (2021) 28(4) Cultural Geographies 597, 602.

16Aileen Moreton-Robinson (Goenpul woman of the Quandamooka People), ‘Relationality: A Key Presupposition of an Indigenous Social Research Paradigm’ in Jean M O’Brien and Chris Andersen (eds), Sources and Methods in Indigenous Studies (Routledge, 2017) 69; Lauren Tynan (Trawlwulwuy), ‘What Is Relationality? Indigenous Knowledges, Practices and Responsibilities with Kin’ (2021) 28(4) Cultural Geographies 597; Irene Watson (Tanganekald, Meintangk, Bunganditj and Potaruwutj), Aboriginal Peoples, Colonialism and International Law: Raw Law (Routledge, 2014); Shawn Wilson (Opaskwayak Cree), Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods (Fernwood Publishing, 2008).

17Louise Gwenneth Phillips and Tracey Bunda (Ngugi/Wakka Wakka), Research Through, With and As Storying (Routledge, 2020) 8.

18Jo-Ann Archibald Q’um Q’um Xiiem (Stó:lō), Indigenous Storywork: Educating the Heart, Mind, Body, and Spirit (UBC Press, 2008); Jo-Ann Archibald Q’um Q’um Xiiem (Stó:lō), Jenny Bol Jun Lee-Morgan (Waikato, Ngāti Mahuta, Te Ahiwaru, Chinese) and Jason De Santolo (Garrwa and Barunggam) (eds), Decolonizing Research: Indigenous Storywork as Methodology (Zed Books, 2019); Larissa Behrendt (Euahleyai / Gamillaroi), ‘Indigenous Storytelling, Decolonizing Institutions and Assertive Self-Determination: Implications for Legal Practice’ in Jo-Ann Archibald Q’um Q’um Xiiem (Stó:lō), Jenny Bol Jun Lee-Morgan (Waikato, Ngāti Mahuta, Te Ahiwaru, Chinese) and Jason De Santolo (Garrwa and Barunggam) (eds), Decolonizing Research: Indigenous Storywork as Methodology (Zed Books, 2019) 175; Louise Gwenneth Phillips and Tracey Bunda (Ngugi/Wakka Wakka), Research Through, With and As Storying (Routledge, 2020); Linda Tuhiwai Smith (Ngāti Awa, Ngāti Porou and Tuhourangi), Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (Zed Books, 2nd ed, 2012).

19Larissa Behrendt (Euahleyai / Gamillaroi), ‘Indigenous Storytelling, Decolonizing Institutions and Assertive Self-Determination: Implications for Legal Practice’ in Jo-Ann Archibald Q’um Q’um Xiiem (Stó:lō), Jenny Bol Jun Lee-Morgan (Waikato, Ngāti Mahuta, Te Ahiwaru, Chinese) and Jason De Santolo (Garrwa and Barunggam) (eds), Decolonizing Research: Indigenous Storywork as Methodology (Zed Books, 2019) 175.

20Larissa Behrendt (Euahleyai / Gamillaroi), ‘Indigenous Storytelling, Decolonizing Institutions and Assertive Self-Determination: Implications for Legal Practice’ in Jo-Ann Archibald Q’um Q’um Xiiem (Stó:lō), Jenny Bol Jun Lee-Morgan (Waikato, Ngāti Mahuta, Te Ahiwaru, Chinese) and Jason De Santolo (Garrwa and Barunggam) (eds), Decolonizing Research: Indigenous Storywork as Methodology (Zed Books, 2019) 175, 175.

21Ambelin Kwaymullina (Palyku), ‘The Creators of the Future: Women, Law and Telling Stories in Country’ in Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Jeannie Herbert, Jill Milroy (Palyku) and Darlene Oxenham (Malgana)(eds), Us Women, Our Ways, Our World (Magabala Books, 2017), 97.

22Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Bringing Them Home, Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families (Report, 1997); Mia Tjalaminu (Mineng and Goreng), Blaze Kwaymullina (Palyku) and Sally Morgan (Palku and Nyamal)(eds), Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit, and Creation (Fremantle Press, 2008); Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023).

23Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Bringing Them Home, Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families (Report, 1997).

24‘Education Program’, Kinchela Boys Home Aboriginal Corporation (Web Page) <https://kinchelaboyshome.org.au/what-we-do/education-program/>.

25‘Coota Girls Survivor Stories Digital Archive’, Coota Girls Aboriginal Corporation (Web Page) <https://coota-girls-stories.intersect.org.au/>.

26Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023) 134.

27BJ Newton (Wiradjuri), ‘Understanding Child Neglect in Aboriginal Families and Communities in the Context of Trauma’ (2019) 24(2) Child & Family Social Work 218, 223.

28Judy Atkinson (Jiman/Bundjalung), Trauma Trails, Recreating Song Lines: The Transgenerational Effects of Trauma in Indigenous Australia (Spinifex Press, 2002) 18.

29Judy Atkinson (Jiman/Bundjalung), Trauma Trails, Recreating Song Lines: The Transgenerational Effects of Trauma in Indigenous Australia (Spinifex Press, 2002) 35.

30Karen Menzies, ‘Understanding the Australian Aboriginal Experience of Collective, Historical and Intergenerational Trauma’ (2019) 62(6) International Social Work 1522, 1528.

31Helen Milroy, Patricia Dudgeon and Roz Walker, ‘Community Life and Development Programs: Pathways to Healing, Working Together’ in Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku)and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014) 419.

32Cressida Fforde, Lawrence Bamblett, Ray Lovett (Ngiyampaa/Wongaibon), Scott Gorringe (Mithaka), and Bill Fogarty, ‘Discourse, Deficit and Identity: Aboriginality, the Race Paradigm and the Language of Representation in Contemporary Australia’ (2013) 149(1) Media International Australia 162, 162.

33Michael Dodson (Yawuru), ‘The End in the Beginning: Re(de)finding Aboriginality’ (Wentworth Lecture, Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, 1994); Cressida Fforde, Lawrence Bamblett, Ray Lovett (Ngiyampaa/Wongaibon), Scott Gorringe (Mithaka), and Bill Fogarty, ‘Discourse, Deficit and Identity: Aboriginality, the Race Paradigm and the Language of Representation in Contemporary Australia’ (2013) 149(1) Media International Australia 162; William Fogarty, Hannah Bulloch, Siobhan McDonnell and Michael Davis, Lowitja Institute and National Centre for Indigenous Studies, Deficit Discourse and Indigenous Health (Report, May 2018).

34Cressida Fforde, Lawrence Bamblett, Ray Lovett (Ngiyampaa/Wongaibon), Scott Gorringe (Mithaka) and Bill Fogarty, ‘Discourse, Deficit and Identity: Aboriginality, the Race Paradigm and the Language of Representation in Contemporary Australia’ (2013) 149(1) Media International Australia 162, 164.

35Larissa Behrendt (Euahleyai / Gamillaroi), Finding Eliza: Power and Colonial Storytelling (University of Queensland Press, 2016); Richard Broome, Aboriginal Australians: A History since 1788 (Allen & Unwin, 5th ed, 2019); Michael Dodson (Yawuru), ‘The End in the Beginning: Re(de)finding Aboriginality’ (Wentworth Lecture, Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, 1994); Aileen Moreton-Robinson (Goenpul woman of the Quandamooka People), The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty (University of Minnesota Press, 2015); Martin Nakata (Torres Strait Islander), Disciplining the Savages, Savaging the Disciplines (Aboriginal Studies Press, 2007); Irene Watson (Tanganekald, Meintangk, Bunganditj and Potaruwutj), Aboriginal Peoples, Colonialism and International Law: Raw Law (Routledge, 2014).

36Richard Broome, Aboriginal Australians: A History since 1788 (Allen & Unwin, 5th ed, 2019); Anna Haebich, Broken Circles: Fragmenting Indigenous Families, 1800–2000 (Fremantle Arts Centre Press, 2000); Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Bringing Them Home, Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families (Report, 1997); Vanessa Turnbull‐Roberts (Bundjalung Widubul-Wiabul), Michael Salter and BJ Newton (Wiradjuri), ‘Trauma Then and Now: Implications of Adoption Reform for First Nations Children’ (2022) 27(2) Child & Family Social Work 163.

37Wiyi Yani U Thangani (Women’s Voices): Securing Our Rights, Securing Our Future (Report, Australian Human Rights Commission, December 2020) 79.

38Aileen Moreton-Robinson (Goenpul woman of the Quandamooka People), ‘Whiteness, epistemology and Indigenous representation’ in Aileen Moreton-Robinson (ed), Whitening Race: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism (Aboriginal Studies Press, 2005) 75, 75.

39Law Society of New South Wales, Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination: Introductory Guidance and Strategies for the Legal Profession (Report, March 2024) 8.

40Larissa Behrendt (Euahleyai / Gamillaroi), and Lindon Coombes (Yuwaalaraay), Do Better: Independent Review into Collingwood Football Club’s Responses to Incidents of Racism and Cultural Safety in the Workplace (Final Report, 2021) 14.

41Law Society of New South Wales, Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination: Introductory Guidance and Strategies for the Legal Profession (Report, March 2024) 7 (citations omitted).

42P Swan and B Raphael, Ways Forward: National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health Policy: National Consultancy Report (1995) 7, 20, quoting the National Aboriginal and Islander Health Organisation (1982) and National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation.

43Graham Gee, Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Clinton Schultz (Gamilaraay), Amanda Hart and Kerrie Kelly, ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing’ in Patricia Dudgeon, Helen Milroy and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014) 55; Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku) and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014); Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023).

44Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku)and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014); Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023).

45Graham Gee, Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Clinton Schultz (Gamilaraay), Amanda Hart and Kerrie Kelly, ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing’ in Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku) and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014) 55, 55.

46Graham Gee, Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Clinton Schultz (Gamilaraay), Amanda Hart and Kerrie Kelly, ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing’ in Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku) and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014) 55, 57.

47Graham Gee, Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Clinton Schultz (Gamilaraay), Amanda Hart and Kerrie Kelly, ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing’ in Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku) and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014) 55, 57. Note that these principles were created by the Social Health Reference Group for the National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples’ Mental Health and Social and Emotional Well Being 2004–09 and drawn from P Swan and B Raphael, Ways Forward: National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health Policy National Consultancy Report (1995). An up-to-date and detailed overview of the principles are contained in Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council, National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples’ Mental Health and Social and Emotional Wellbeing: 2017–2023 (2017) 3.

48Graham Gee, Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Clinton Schultz (Gamilaraay), Amanda Hart and Kerrie Kelly, ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social and Emotional Wellbeing’ in Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku) and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014) 55, 57.

49Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023) 35.

50Mia Tjalaminu (Mineng and Goreng), Blaze Kwaymullina (Palyku) and Sally Morgan (Palku and Nyamal) (eds), Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit, and Creation (Fremantle Press, 2008).

51Joan Winch (Nyungar and Martu),‘A Feeling of Belonging’ in Mia Tjalaminu (Mineng and Goreng), Blaze Kwaymullina (Palyku) and Sally Morgan (Palku and Nyamal) (eds), Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit, and Creation (Fremantle Press, 2008) 231.

52Mia Tjalaminu (Mineng and Goreng), Blaze Kwaymullina (Palyku) and Sally Morgan (Palku and Nyamal) (eds), Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit, and Creation (Fremantle Press, 2008); Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023); Victor Steffensen, Fire Country: How Indigenous Fire Management Could Help Save Australia (Hardie Grant Travel, 2020) 235; Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku)and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014); Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healing Foundation, Voices from the Campfires: Establishing the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healing Foundation (Report, 2009); P Swan and B Raphael, Ways Forward: National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health Policy National Consultancy Report (1995).

53Megan Davis (Cobble Cobble and South Sea Islander), Family Is Culture: Independent Review of Aboriginal Children and Young People in OOHC (Report, October 2019) 320, citing Australian Law Reform Commission, Connection to Country: Review of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (Report No 126, April 2015) 175.

54Jacynta Krakouer (Mineng Noongar), Sarah Wise and Marie Connolly, ‘“We Live and Breathe Through Culture”: Conceptualising Cultural Connection for Indigenous Australian Children in Out-of-Home Care’ (2018) 71(3) Australian Social Work 265, 271.

55Jacynta Krakouer (Mineng Noongar), Sarah Wise and Marie Connolly, ‘“We Live and Breathe Through Culture”: Conceptualising Cultural Connection for Indigenous Australian Children in Out-of-Home Care’ (2018) 71(3) Australian Social Work 265, 272.

56Amy Kennedy (Wiradjuri), ‘Resilience: An Aboriginal Perspective’ in Bindi Bennett and Sue Green (eds), Our Voices: Aboriginal Social Work (Red Globe Press, 2nd ed, reprinted by Bloomsbury Academic, 2019) 117, 131.

57Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023) 137.

58Ambelin Kwaymullina (Palyku), ‘Introduction: a land of many countries’ in Mia Tjalaminu (Mineng and Goreng), Blaze Kwaymullina (Palyku) and Sally Morgan (Palku and Nyamal)(eds), Heartsick for Country: Stories of Love, Spirit, and Creation (Fremantle Press, 2008) 17.

59Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku)and Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014); Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023); Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healing Foundation, Voices from the Campfires: Establishing the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healing Foundation (Report, 2009); Vanessa Edwige (Ngarabal) and Paul Gray (Wiradjuri), Significance of Culture to Wellbeing, Healing and Rehabilitation (Report, Bugmy Bar Book Committee, June 2021); Allyson Campbell, Jane Pedersen, Kimberley Hunter, Niamh Kealy (Nyikina), Nick Devereaux, Sophie Spry, Terri Reid (Wuthathi, Meriam and Gamilaroi), Chloe Wegener (Gaarwa), Skye Trudgett (Gamillaroi) and Haley Ferguson, The Wiyi Yani U Thangani Change Agenda for First Nations Gender Justice (Report, 2024).

60The Healing Foundation, Glossary of Healing Terms (Poster, July 2020).

61The Healing Foundation, Glossary of Healing Terms (Poster, July 2020); Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healing Foundation, Voices from the Campfires: Establishing the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healing Foundation (Report, 2009) 7, 11; Vanessa Edwige (Ngarabal) and Paul Gray (Wiradjuri), Significance of Culture to Wellbeing, Healing and Rehabilitation (Report, Bugmy Bar Book Committee, June 2021); Nicole Tujague(Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023).

62Helen Milroy (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku)and Roz Walker, ‘Community Life and Development Programs — Pathways to Healing, Working Together’ in Patricia Dudgeon (Bardi), Helen Milroy (Palyku) Roz Walker (eds), Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice (Kulunga Research Network, 2nd ed, 2014) 419.

63Victor Steffensen (Tagalaka), Fire Country: How Indigenous Fire Management Could Help Save Australia (Hardie Grant Travel, 2020) 235.

64Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023) 35–6.

65Allyson Campbell, Jane Pedersen, Kimberley Hunter (Nyikina), Niamh Kealy (Nyikina), Nick Devereaux, Sophie Spry, Terri Reid (Wuthathi, Meriam and Gamilaroi), Chloe Wegener (Gaarwa), Skye Trudgett (Gamillaroi) and Haley Ferguson, The Wiyi Yani U Thangani Change Agenda for First Nations Gender Justice (Report, 2024) 11.

66The Healing Foundation, Glossary of Healing Terms (Poster, July 2020); Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healing Foundation, Voices from the Campfires: Establishing the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healing Foundation (Report, 2009) 7, 11; Vanessa Edwige (Ngarabal) and Paul Gray (Wiradjuri), Significance of Culture to Wellbeing, Healing and Rehabilitation (Report, Bugmy Bar Book Committee, June 2021); Nicole Tujague (Kabi Kabi) and Kelleigh Ryan (Kabi Kabi), Cultural Safety in Trauma-Informed Practice from a First Nations Perspective: Billabongs of Knowledge (Springer, 2023).

67Vanessa Edwige (Ngarabal) and Paul Gray (Wiradjuri), Significance of Culture to Wellbeing, Healing and Rehabilitation (Report, Bugmy Bar Book Committee, June 2021).

68In other words, many First Nations have continued to ‘nation build’. For a description see Miriam Jorgensen, Alison Vivian, Anthea Compton, Donna Murray (Wiradjuri and Wonnarua), Debra Evans (Malyangapa and Ngiyampaa), and Janine Gertz (Gugu Badhun), ‘Yes, The Time Is Now: Indigenous Nation Policy Making for Self-Determined Futures’ in Nikki Moodie and Sarah Maddison (eds), Public Policy and Indigenous Futures (Springer, 2023) 129.

69See, for example, Aboriginal freedom fighters such as Pemulwuy, Windradyne and Yagan who led their nations in battle against the invaders, the 1938 Day of Mourning, the 1965 Freedom Rides, the 1966 Wave Hill walk-off and the 1972 Tent Embassy. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and peoples have long refused to accept the British — and later Australian — claim to a single ‘settler’ sovereignty over their lands and waters. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and peoples have also made consistent statements — including the Petition of William Cooper to King George VI (1933), the Yirrkala Bark Petitions (1963), the Barunga Statement (1988), the Kalkaringi Statement (1998) and the Uluru Statement from the Heart (2017) — about such cultural and political distinctiveness.

70This is present, for example, in Bill Cooper’s 1938 advocacy for Aboriginal representation in Parliament, necessary because ‘our lands have been expropriated’ (Petition to King George V from the ‘Aboriginal Inhabitants of Australia’ (1938) <https://www.naa.gov.au/students-and-teachers/learning-resources/learning-resource-themes/first-australians/rights-and-freedoms/petition-king-george-v-aboriginal-inhabitants-australia>); Jack Patten’s (Yorta Yorta) 1938 call for ‘freedom and equal citizenship’ for ‘the original owners of the land’ <https://aiatsis.gov.au/explore/day-of-mourning> the Yolngu’s 1963 petitions to protect their Country, ‘livelihood and independence’ <https://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/resources/transcripts/cth15_doc_1963.pdf>; the 1988 Barunga Statement’s call on the Australian Government to ‘recognise our rights: to self determination and self management … [and] permanent control and enjoyment of our ancestral lands …’ as well as an elected Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisation and national system of land rights <https://www.aph.gov.au/Visit_Parliament/Art/Stories/Barunga_Statement>; the 1998 Kalkaringi Statement’s assertion of the need for ‘equality, co-existence and mutual respect’ between the Northern Territory and the ongoing ‘systems of Aboriginal law and Aboriginal structures of law and governance’ <https://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/journals/IndigLawB/1998/73.html>; and the 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart’s call for widespread structural reform, including a Voice to Parliament, truth-telling and agreement-making processes, based on First Nations ongoing sovereignties, that have ‘never been ceded or extinguished’ <https://ulurustatement.org/the-statement/view-the-statement>.

71See G Yunupingu (1948-2023), Gumatj people, Marrirra Marawili (c.1937-2018), Madarrpa people, Bakulangay Marawili (c.1944-2002), Madarrpa people, Djambawa Marawili (born 1953), Madarrpa people, Dula Ŋgurruwuthun (c.1936-2001), Munyuku people, Djewiny Ŋgurruwuthun (c.1940-2001), Munyuku people, Lindsay Turner Jampijinpa (1951-2009), Warlpiri people, Mr D Williams Japanangka (1948-2013), Warlpiri people, Wenten Rubuntja (c.1923-2005), Arrernte people, The Barunga Statement (1988) <https://www.aph.gov.au/Visit_Parliament/Art/Stories/Barunga_Statement>; First Nations National Constitutional Convention, Uluru Statement from the Heart (26 May 2017) <https://ulurustatement.org/the-statement/view-the-statement>.

72As Elizabeth Povinelli outlines, when speaking to settler Australia, Aboriginal people must use ‘whatever language and moral framework prevails at the time of enunciation’ (whether, for example, assimilationist thinking has remained dominant; or whether particular civil rights, ‘human rights’ or ‘Indigenous rights’ are intelligible); Elizabeth Povinelli, The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism (Duke University Press, 2002) 6, 39 (emphasis in original).

73Laura Rademaker and Tim Rowse, ‘How Shall We Write the History of Self-Determination in Australia?’ in Laura Rademaker and Tim Rowse (eds), Indigenous Self-Determination in Australia: Histories and Historiography (Australian National University Press, 2020) 1, 12.

74Asmi Wood, ‘Self-Determination under International Law and Some Possibilities for Australia’s Indigenous Peoples’ in Laura Rademaker and Tim Rowse (eds), Indigenous Self-Determination in Australia: Histories and Historiography (Australian National University Press, 2020) 269, 279.

75Laura Rademaker and Tim Rowse, ‘How Shall We Write the History of Self-Determination in Australia?’ in Laura Rademaker and Tim Rowse (eds), Indigenous Self-Determination in Australia: Histories and Historiography (Australian National University Press, 2020) 1, 12.

76United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, GA Res 61/295, UN Doc A/RES/61/295 (2 October 2007, adopted 13 September 2007). For a discussion of the importance of UNDRIP to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, see Asmi Wood, ‘Self-Determination under International Law and Some Possibilities for Australia’s Indigenous Peoples’ in Laura Rademaker and Tim Rowse (eds), Indigenous Self-Determination in Australia: Histories and Historiography (Australian National University Press, 2020) 269.

77United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, GA Res 61/295, UN Doc A/RES/61/295 (2 October 2007, adopted 13 September 2007) arts 3, 4, 5–15.

78Aaron John Spitzer, ‘The Settler-Rights Backlash: Understanding Liberal Challenges to Indigenous Self-Determination’ (2022) 12(5) Territory, Politics, Governance 573.

79Elizabeth Povinelli, The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism (Duke University Press, 2002).

80Larissa Behrendt (Euahleyai / Gamillaroi), Achieving Social Justice: Indigenous Rights and Australia’s Future (Federation Press, 2003) 115.

81Laura Rademaker and Tim Rowse, ‘How Shall We Write the History of Self-Determination in Australia?’ in Laura Rademaker and Tim Rowse (eds), Indigenous Self-Determination in Australia: Histories and Historiography (Australian National University Press, 2020) 1, 12.

82For further description of Indigenous nation building strategies and experiences in Australia, see Miriam Jorgensen, Alison Vivian, Anthea Compton, , Donna Murray (Wiradjuri and Wonnarua), Debra Evans (Malyangapa and Ngiyampaa), and Janine Gertz (Gugu Badhun), ‘Yes, The Time Is Now: Indigenous Nation Policy Making for Self-Determined Futures’ in Nikki Moodie and Sarah Maddison (eds), Public Policy and Indigenous Futures (Springer, 2023) 129; Daryle Rigney, Simone Bignall, Alison Vivian and Steve Hemming, ‘Indigenous Nation Building and the Political Determinants of Health and Wellbeing’ (Discussion Paper, August 2022); Daryle Rigney (Ngarrindjeri), Simone Bignall, Alison Vivian, Steve Hemming, Shaun Berg and Damein Bell (Gunditjmara), ‘Treating Treaty as a Technology for Indigenous Nation Building’ in Diane Smith, Alice Wighton, Stephen Cornell and Adam Vai Delaney (eds), Developing Governance and Governing Development: International Case Studies of Indigenous Futures (Rowman & Littlefield, 2021) 119; Steve Hemming and Daryle Rigney (Ngarrindjeri), ‘Unsettling Sustainability: Ngarrindjeri Political Literacies, Strategies of Engagement and Transformation’ (2008) 22(6) Continuum 757; Steve Hemming, Daryle Rigney (Ngarrindjeri), and Shaun Berg, ‘Ngarrindjeri Futures: Negotiation, Governance and Environmental Management’ in Morgan Brigg and Sarah Maddison (eds), Unsettling the Settler State: Creativity and Resistance in Indigenous Settler-State Governance (Federation Press, 2011) 104; Theresa Petray and Janine Gertz (Gugu Badhun), ‘Building an Economy and Building a Nation: Gugu Badhun Self-Determination as Prefigurative Resistance’ (2018) 12(1) Global Media Journal 12(1); Toni Bauman and Diane Smith, ‘Indigenous Self-Governance and “Nation” Building: Considerations for a Strategic Self-Analysis Tool’ (Centre for Indigenous Policy Research, Discussion Paper No 304, August 2022).

83See, eg, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Prisoners in Australia, 2025 ABS, accessed 7 April 2026, AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) (2026) Child protection Australia 2023–24, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 7 April 2026.